From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Westphal Subject: Re: [nft] add default branch for code integrality Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:34:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20151126103412.GA22027@breakpoint.cc> References: <0A900C78B9F2324AB7F4F7A51D1A2F8577978285@szxema505-mbs.china.huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "pablo@netfilter.org" , "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" To: Linmujia Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([80.244.247.6]:36354 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751014AbbKZKeS (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:34:18 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0A900C78B9F2324AB7F4F7A51D1A2F8577978285@szxema505-mbs.china.huawei.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Linmujia wrote: > @@ -1778,14 +1784,17 @@ static int netlink_events_chain_cb(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int type, > nftnl_chain_get_str(nlc, > NFTNL_CHAIN_NAME)); > break; > + default: > + break; > } > - break; > case NFTNL_OUTPUT_XML: That looks bogus. We would now fallthough to XML label? Did you test this...?