netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: conntrack: resched in nf_ct_iterate_cleanup
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 18:16:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151211171659.GA1135@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151211144313.GD8811@breakpoint.cc>

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 03:43:13PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> > Ulrich reports soft lockup with following (shortened) callchain:
> > 
> > NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s!
> > __netif_receive_skb_core+0x6e4/0x774
> > process_backlog+0x94/0x160
> > net_rx_action+0x88/0x178
> > call_do_softirq+0x24/0x3c
> > do_softirq+0x54/0x6c
> > __local_bh_enable_ip+0x7c/0xbc
> > nf_ct_iterate_cleanup+0x11c/0x22c [nf_conntrack]
> > masq_inet_event+0x20/0x30 [nf_nat_masquerade_ipv6]
> > atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x1c/0x2c
> > ipv6_del_addr+0x1bc/0x220 [ipv6]
> > 
> > Problem is that nf_ct_iterate_cleanup can run for a very long time
> > since it can be interrupted by softirq processing.
> > Moreover, atomic_notifier_call_chain runs with rcu readlock held.
> 
> Ulrich just reported another softlockup even with this patch applied.
> 
> One explanation would be non-matching iter(), in this case
> get_next_corpse can take forever since it will walk the entire conntrack
> table, rendering the cond_resched moot.

Probably another reincarnation of 0838aa7fcfcd? Is Ulrich using
conntrack templates?

> A V2 patch will be coming to also add a lock break + resched to
> get_next_corpse.

BTW, the atomic chain notifier in IPv6 seems to be there to handle
this update from the packet path:

 ndisc_rcv()
 ndisc_router_discovery()
 addrconf_prefix_rcv()
 manage_tempaddrs()
 ipv6_add_addr()
 inet6addr_notifier_call_chain()

Probably we can get Hannes have a look into this, I think we can
convert this chain to blocking one through workqueue since
addrconf_prefix_rcv() returns void. The remaining call sites of
inet6addr_notifier_call_chain() that I could tracked come from paths
where I can see ASSERT_RTNL(), so user context is guaranteed.

I'm telling this become I remember that we discussed in netconf'14
Chicago that it would be good to get rid of this kind og asymmetries
between IPv4 and IPv6.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-11 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-09 17:30 [PATCH nf] netfilter: conntrack: resched in nf_ct_iterate_cleanup Florian Westphal
2015-12-11 11:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-12-11 11:53   ` Florian Westphal
2015-12-11 14:43 ` Florian Westphal
2015-12-11 17:16   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2015-12-11 17:21     ` Florian Westphal
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-20 10:16 Florian Westphal
2016-02-01 17:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151211171659.GA1135@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).