From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] extensions: libxt_mark: Add translation to nft Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 03:18:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20151220021845.GA946@salvia> References: <20151218214013.GA26438@salvia> <20151219174720.GA1421@salvia> <20151219183443.GA2170@salvia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Shivani Bhardwaj Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:56928 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750746AbbLTCS4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Dec 2015 21:18:56 -0500 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AE911E5A5 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 03:18:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5090EDA7FF for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 03:18:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766BFDA7FF for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 03:18:50 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 01:06:33AM +0530, Shivani Bhardwaj wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:51:14PM +0530, Shivani Bhardwaj wrote: > >> Ampersand again causes syntax error. However, it works fine as below: > >> > >> nft insert rule ip filter INPUT ct mark 0xa counter > > > > Yes, that is fine as I indicated in a previous email. > > Thank you. > Could you please tell why ct mark and not simply mark? This should obviously be simply mark, not ct mark.