From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Shivani Bhardwaj <shivanib134@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] extensions: libxt_NFQUEUE: Add translation to nft
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:21:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151222202112.GA4470@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKHNQQE0=tQQcaWCvAgyQGA3yiM3mfZcoLcrfb-Kn8DKaY=+6w@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 01:08:51AM +0530, Shivani Bhardwaj wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:53:43PM +0530, Shivani Bhardwaj wrote:
> >> Add translation of NF queue to nftables.
> >>
> >> Examples:
> >>
> >> $ sudo iptables-translate -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -j NFQUEUE --queue-num 30
> >> nft add rule ip nat PREROUTING tcp dport 80 counter queue num 30
> >>
> >> $ sudo iptables-translate -A FORWARD -j NFQUEUE --queue-num 0 --queue-bypass -p TCP --sport 80
> >> nft add rule ip filter FORWARD tcp sport 80 counter queue num 0 bypass
> > ^
> > Make sure this space is gone in a v2 of this patch.
> >
> >> $ sudo iptables-translate -A FORWARD -j NFQUEUE --queue-balance 0:3
> >> nft add rule ip filter FORWARD counter queue num 0-3 fanout
> >
> > I think --queue-balance is independent from fanout. Check the code and
> > make sure this is correct.
> >
> Hi,
>
> I have taken reference from here :
> http://wiki.nftables.org/wiki-nftables/index.php/Queueing_to_userspace
>
> It says:
> When doing load balancing, you can use the fanout option to use the
> CPU ID as an index to map packets to the queues. The idea is that you
> can improve performance if there's a queue/userspace application per
> CPU
>
> Please let me know if I have understood this wrong.
I think this description above is not precise, please have a look at:
man iptables-extensions and check NFQUEUE, so you make sure you're
interpreting things the right way.
--queue-balance value:value
This specifies a range of queues to use. Packets are
then balanced across the given queues. This is useful for
multicore systems: start multiple instances of the
userspace program on queues x, x+1, .. x+n and use
"--queue-balance x:x+n". Packets belonging to the same
connection are put into the same nfqueue.
--queue-cpu-fanout
Available starting Linux kernel 3.10. When used together
with --queue-balance this will use the CPU ID as an index
to map packets to the queues. The idea is that you can improve
performance if there's a queue per CPU. This requires
--queue-balance to be specified.
So fanout is optional.
You can also fix the wiki to avoid this ambiguity. Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-22 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-21 13:23 [PATCH] extensions: libxt_NFQUEUE: Add translation to nft Shivani Bhardwaj
2015-12-22 16:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-12-22 19:38 ` Shivani Bhardwaj
2015-12-22 20:21 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151222202112.GA4470@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shivanib134@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox