From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [nft] syntax for retrieving ct byte/packet counters
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 14:43:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160107134351.GD23789@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
Hi.
I've finished the kernel patch to fetch byte/packet conntrack counters.
As discussed earlier, I added two modes:
- fetch original or reply
- fetch sum of original+reply direction
(i.e. nft_ct adds original+reply before storing result into register).
How should that look like on the userspace side?
I see two solutions to handle this. Option one is to add a new
pseudo-direction, e.g. "both":
nft ... ct packets both gt 42
nft ... ct packets original gt 42
Second option -- which I'd prefer -- is to allow omitting the direction.
This seems possible w.o. adding parser problems by switching direction
and key, so we'd have:
nft ... ct packets gt 42
nft ... ct reply packets gt 42
nft ... ct original packets gt 42
Because parser would just add
ct_key_counters : BYTES | PACKETS;
ct_expr: CT ct_key_counters | CT STRING ct_key_counters
which doesn't introduce ambiguity (original and reply aren't scanner
tokens, unlike ct_keys)
If we follow this route, i'd also swap the direction and key argument
for the existing saddr/daddr/etc keys, i.e. instead of
... 'ct saddr original 1.2.3.4' we'd have
... ct original saddr 1.2.3.4 ...
This would make packets/bytes work *both* like ct_keys with and without
direction:
ct mark gt 42 ---> fetch mark
ct original mark gt 42 -> parser error, mark can only be used w/o dir
ct saddr 1.2.3.4 -> parser error, saddr needs direction
ct original saddr 1.2.3.4 -> fetch ct saddr in original dir
ct packets gt 42 -> fetch sum of packet counter for original and reply
ct original packets gt 42 -> fetch packet counter for original
What do others think?
Swapping key and direction breaks backwards compatibility but
this was added only recently so I think it shouldn't be a problem.
next reply other threads:[~2016-01-07 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-07 13:43 Florian Westphal [this message]
2016-01-07 17:53 ` [nft] syntax for retrieving ct byte/packet counters Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160107134351.GD23789@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).