netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [nft] syntax for retrieving ct byte/packet counters
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 14:43:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160107134351.GD23789@breakpoint.cc> (raw)

Hi.

I've finished the kernel patch to fetch byte/packet conntrack counters.

As discussed earlier, I added two modes:
- fetch original or reply
- fetch sum of original+reply direction
  (i.e. nft_ct adds original+reply before storing result into register).

How should that look like on the userspace side?

I see two solutions to handle this.  Option one is to add a new
pseudo-direction, e.g. "both":
nft ... ct packets both gt 42
nft ... ct packets original gt 42

Second option -- which I'd prefer -- is to allow omitting the direction.
This seems possible w.o. adding parser problems by switching direction
and key, so we'd have:

nft ... ct packets gt 42
nft ... ct reply packets gt 42
nft ... ct original packets gt 42

Because parser would just add

ct_key_counters	: BYTES | PACKETS;
ct_expr:	CT ct_key_counters | CT STRING ct_key_counters

which doesn't introduce ambiguity (original and reply aren't scanner
tokens, unlike ct_keys)

If we follow this route, i'd also swap the direction and key argument
for the existing saddr/daddr/etc keys, i.e. instead of

... 'ct saddr original 1.2.3.4' we'd have
... ct original saddr 1.2.3.4 ...

This would make packets/bytes work *both* like ct_keys with and without
direction:

ct mark gt 42   ---> fetch mark
ct original mark gt 42	-> parser error, mark can only be used w/o dir
ct saddr 1.2.3.4 -> parser error, saddr needs direction
ct original saddr 1.2.3.4 -> fetch ct saddr in original dir
ct packets gt 42 -> fetch sum of packet counter for original and reply
ct original packets gt 42 -> fetch packet counter for original

What do others think?

Swapping key and direction breaks backwards compatibility but
this was added only recently so I think it shouldn't be a problem.

             reply	other threads:[~2016-01-07 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-07 13:43 Florian Westphal [this message]
2016-01-07 17:53 ` [nft] syntax for retrieving ct byte/packet counters Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160107134351.GD23789@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).