From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] nftables: byteorder: avoid uneeded le/be conversion steps Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:01:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20160113130141.GA19369@salvia> References: <1452548972-24454-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Westphal Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:36929 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755217AbcAMNBu (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:01:50 -0500 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F0EE3A2E for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:01:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id D425ADA87A for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:01:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEABFDA807 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:01:46 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1452548972-24454-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:49:32PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > David points out that we to three le/be conversions instead > of just one. Doesn't matter on x86_64 w. gcc, but other > architectures might be less lucky. > > Since it also simplifies code just follow his advice. Applied, thanks Florian.