netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: brouer@redhat.com, pablo@netfilter.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: nf_conntrack: use safer way to lock all buckets
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:06:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160115080653.137e0ad6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452791036-2161-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com>

On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> wrote:

> When we need to lock all buckets in the connection hashtable we'd attempt to
> lock 1024 spinlocks, which is way more preemption levels than supported by
> the kernel. Furthermore, this behavior was hidden by checking if lockdep is
> enabled, and if it was - use only 8 buckets(!).
> 
> Fix this by using a global lock and synchronize all buckets on it when we
> need to lock them all. This is pretty heavyweight, but is only done when we
> need to resize the hashtable, and that doesn't happen often enough (or at all).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>

[...]
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> index 3cb3cb8..4ccf5ad 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_locks);
>  __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nf_conntrack_expect_lock);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_expect_lock);
>  
> +spinlock_t nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock;
> +bool nf_conntrack_locks_all;

You forgot to mark these static and __read_mostly as Florian pointed out...

After that you can add my:
 Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-15  7:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-14 17:03 [PATCH v2] netfilter: nf_conntrack: use safer way to lock all buckets Sasha Levin
2016-01-14 17:25 ` Florian Westphal
2016-01-15  7:06 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160115080653.137e0ad6@redhat.com \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).