From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH] extensions: libxt_connlabel: Add translation to nft Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:05:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20160307130524.GA26624@salvia> References: <20160305214746.GA16464@gmail.com> <20160306000703.GA31513@breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Shivani Bhardwaj , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Westphal Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:36294 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752641AbcCGNFe (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:05:34 -0500 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1B74B0F7 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:05:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB9F28D239 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:05:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E0ACA105 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:05:25 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160306000703.GA31513@breakpoint.cc> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 01:07:03AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > Shivani Bhardwaj wrote: > > Add translation for connlabel to nftables. > > Full translation for this match awaits the support for --set option. > > Hmm, I sent patches for that a while ago, don't know why they were > not applied... Pablo? Please, push the the connlabel support to nft. We can probably introduce something like: ct connlabel bitset bar instead of: ct connlabel set ct connlabel | bar in a follow up patch, which looks more compact to me. We can accept both syntax I'd say so we can introduce this without breaking backward.