From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC] net: ipv4 -- Introduce ifa limit per net Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:10:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20160309.161038.283281065293712589.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20160309204158.GO2207@uranus.lan> <20160309.154725.1921352291794389965.davem@davemloft.net> <20160309205746.GQ2207@uranus.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, solar@openwall.com, vvs@virtuozzo.com, avagin@virtuozzo.com, xemul@virtuozzo.com, vdavydov@virtuozzo.com, khorenko@virtuozzo.com, pablo@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: gorcunov@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:33966 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753593AbcCIVKl (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2016 16:10:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160309205746.GQ2207@uranus.lan> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Cyrill Gorcunov Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 23:57:47 +0300 > Aha! So in your patch __inet_del_ifa bypass first blocking_notifier_call_chain > > __inet_del_ifa > ... > if (in_dev->dead) > goto no_promotions; > > // First call to NETDEV_DOWN > ... > no_promotions: > rtmsg_ifa(RTM_DELADDR, ifa1, nlh, portid); > blocking_notifier_call_chain(&inetaddr_chain, NETDEV_DOWN, ifa1); > > and here we call for NETDEV_DOWN, which then hits masq_device_event > and go further to conntrack code. Yes that's where the notifier comes from, which happens with or without my patch.