netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: gorcunov@gmail.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
	alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, solar@openwall.com, vvs@virtuozzo.com,
	avagin@virtuozzo.com, xemul@virtuozzo.com,
	vdavydov@virtuozzo.com, khorenko@virtuozzo.com,
	pablo@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: ipv4 -- Introduce ifa limit per net
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:58:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160311205854.GB1548@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160311.154046.890043899835986091.davem@davemloft.net>

David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 01:40:56 +0300
> 
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:36:30PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > Works like a charm! So David, what are the next steps then?
> >> > Mind to gather all your patches into one (maybe)?
> >> 
> >> I'll re-review all of the changes tomorrow and also look into ipv6
> >> masq, to see if it needs the same treatment, as well.
> >> 
> >> Thanks for all of your help and testing so far.
> > 
> > Thanks a lot, David!
> 
> Cyrill please retest this final patch and let me know if it still works
> properly.
> 
> I looked at ipv6, and it's more complicated.  The problem is that ipv6
> doesn't mark the inet6dev object as dead in the NETDEV_DOWN case, in
> fact it keeps the object around.  It only releases it and marks it
> dead in the NETDEV_UNREGISTER case.
> 
> We pay a very large price for having allowed the behavior of ipv6 and
> ipv4 to diverge so greatly in these areas :-(
> 
> Nevertheless we should try to fix it somehow, maybe we can detect the
> situation in another way for the ipv6 side.

Note that as the ipv6 inet notifier is atomic; now that
nf_ct_iterate_cleanup can schedule the ipv6 masq version defers the
cleanup to a work queue, with a backlog cap of 16.  So in case
of a gazillion events most will be ignored and teardown should not be
delayed (at least not even close to what ipv4 masq did).

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-11 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20160309175307.GM2207@uranus.lan>
     [not found] ` <20160309.152730.691838022304871697.davem@davemloft.net>
     [not found]   ` <20160309204158.GO2207@uranus.lan>
2016-03-09 20:47     ` [RFC] net: ipv4 -- Introduce ifa limit per net David Miller
2016-03-09 20:57       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-09 21:10         ` David Miller
2016-03-09 21:16           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-10 10:20             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-10 11:03               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-10 15:09                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-10 18:01                   ` David Miller
2016-03-10 18:48                     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-10 19:02                     ` Cong Wang
2016-03-10 19:55                       ` David Miller
2016-03-10 20:01                         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-10 20:03                           ` David Miller
2016-03-10 20:13                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-10 20:19                               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-10 21:05                               ` David Miller
2016-03-10 21:19                                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-10 21:59                                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-10 22:36                                     ` David Miller
2016-03-10 22:40                                       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-11 20:40                                         ` David Miller
2016-03-11 20:58                                           ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2016-03-11 21:00                                           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-11 21:22                                           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-11 21:59                                             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-03-14  3:29                                               ` David Miller
2016-03-10 21:09                         ` Cong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160311205854.GB1548@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=avagin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=solar@openwall.com \
    --cc=vdavydov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=vvs@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=xemul@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).