From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Westphal Subject: Re: [RFC] nft: Remove memory-leak Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 21:22:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20160313202256.GD1548@breakpoint.cc> References: <20160313120843.GA6919@fate> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org To: Piyush Pangtey Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([80.244.247.6]:48932 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754300AbcCMUW7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:22:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160313120843.GA6919@fate> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Piyush Pangtey wrote: > Memory leak due to the absence of matching free : > ==4797== 189 bytes in 27 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 22 of 51 > ==4797== at 0x4C2AB80: malloc (in > /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) > ==4797== by 0x57A3839: strdup (strdup.c:42) > ==4797== by 0x41C00D: xstrdup (utils.c:64) > ==4797== by 0x411E4B: netlink_delinearize_chain.isra.3 (netlink.c:717) > ==4797== by 0x411F20: list_chain_cb (netlink.c:748) > ==4797== by 0x504A943: nft_chain_list_foreach (chain.c:1015) > ==4797== by 0x41455E: netlink_list_chains (netlink.c:771) > ==4797== by 0x4078EF: cache_init_objects (rule.c:90) > ==4797== by 0x4078EF: cache_init (rule.c:130) > ==4797== by 0x4078EF: cache_update (rule.c:147) > ==4797== by 0x40FB09: cmd_evaluate (evaluate.c:2475) > ==4797== by 0x4296BC: nft_parse (parser_bison.y:655) > ==4797== by 0x4064CC: nft_run (main.c:231) > ==4797== by 0x42CE57: cli_complete (cli.c:124) .. > --- a/src/netlink.c > +++ b/src/netlink.c > @@ -714,12 +714,12 @@ static struct chain *netlink_delinearize_chain(struct netlink_ctx *ctx, > chain->priority = > nftnl_chain_get_s32(nlc, NFTNL_CHAIN_PRIO); > chain->type = > - xstrdup(nftnl_chain_get_str(nlc, NFTNL_CHAIN_TYPE)); > + nftnl_chain_get_str(nlc, NFTNL_CHAIN_TYPE); This looks wrong, nlc lifetime is not tied to chain object. Seems chain_free() needs xfree calls for type and ->dev ?