From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: x_tables: deal with bogus nextoffset values Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:02:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20160318220200.GA1574@salvia> References: <1457571362-25441-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de> <20160310141231.GA13006@salvia> <20160318130340.GA9843@unicorn.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, hawkes@google.com To: Michal Kubecek Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:48878 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750775AbcCRWCJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:02:09 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347FF4B0F5 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:02:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AEFDA8F7 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:02:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2F3DA8FA for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:02:01 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160318130340.GA9843@unicorn.suse.cz> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Michal, On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 02:03:40PM +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote: > I can't see this patch neither in nf nor in nf-next even if the other > one (netfilter: x_tables: check for size overflow) is in nf-next. Was it > omitted on purpose or is it a mistake? We've been considering different solutions for this, so this is still under debate, just proposed a new one here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/599721/ Thanks.