From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ip6t_SYNPROXY: unnecessary to check whether ip6_route_output returns NULL Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:27:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20160425122724.GA3559@salvia> References: <1461319017-3421-1-git-send-email-zlpnobody@163.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Liping Zhang To: Liping Zhang Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:60965 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932147AbcDYM3n (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:29:43 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D3AC1243 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:29:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DD5FAB5D for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:29:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67ECA9D11F for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:29:27 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1461319017-3421-1-git-send-email-zlpnobody@163.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:56:57AM -0700, Liping Zhang wrote: > From: Liping Zhang > > ip6_route_output() will never return a NULL pointer, so there's no need > to check it. Applied, thanks.