From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure: Fix logic for flex version check Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:00:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20160617110053.GA3372@salvia> References: <1466114774-1831-1-git-send-email-shivanib134@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Shivani Bhardwaj Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:42433 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752988AbcFQLBA (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:01:00 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E6F302452 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:00:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BF464476 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:00:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869651150DA for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 13:00:53 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1466114774-1831-1-git-send-email-shivanib134@gmail.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Shivani, On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:36:14AM +0530, Shivani Bhardwaj wrote: > According to the previous logic of version check for flex, anything > greater than 2.5.33 but within 2.5.x was acceptable. The issue was > observed when a false warning generated for flex version 2.6.0. > New logic works for basically everything greater than 2.5.33. The patch doesn't say what tree this patch is intended for. Anyway, this idiom has been copy and pasted from other netfilter trees so it would be good to check if conntrack-tools, iptables and nft suffer from this problem that you describe above. Please, resubmit including prefix, eg. [PATCH iptables] configure: ... and let me know, thanks.