From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: Implicit flow tables can't be listed Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:11:14 +0200 Message-ID: <20160623101114.GA6248@salvia> References: <20160616102901.GA27422@breakpoint.cc> <20160622121503.GA12472@salvia> <20160622122547.GA10213@breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nf-devel To: Florian Westphal Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:39677 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751089AbcFWKLS (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 06:11:18 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5062FE7DAA for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:11:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA04FF2C8 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:11:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36304266721 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:11:15 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160622122547.GA10213@breakpoint.cc> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 02:25:47PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > How can we actually relate the rule with the flow table if we have > > several anonymous flow tables? > > nft list table filter > table ip filter { > chain input { > type filter hook input priority 0; policy accept; > flow table __ft0 { ip saddr counter packets 0 bytes 0} > flow table __ft1 { ip daddr counter packets 0 bytes 0} > } > > ... so the internal name will be shown. OK, then enhance the scanner to catch __ and run tests to validate. I don't think this break anything.