From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@bytheb.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 3/3] netfilter: replace list_head with single linked list
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:29:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160711102931.GA18199@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160708233038.GA2067@breakpoint.cc>
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 01:30:38AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Aaron Conole <aconole@bytheb.org> wrote:
> > --- a/net/netfilter/core.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/core
> [..]
> > +#define nf_entry_dereference(e) \
> > + rcu_dereference_protected(e, lockdep_is_held(&nf_hook_mutex))
> >
> > -static struct list_head *nf_find_hook_list(struct net *net,
> > - const struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
> > +static struct nf_hook_entry *nf_find_hook_list(struct net *net,
> > + const struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
> > {
> > - struct list_head *hook_list = NULL;
> > + struct nf_hook_entry *hook_list = NULL;
> >
> > if (reg->pf != NFPROTO_NETDEV)
> > - hook_list = &net->nf.hooks[reg->pf][reg->hooknum];
> > + hook_list = rcu_dereference(net->nf.hooks[reg->pf]
> > + [reg->hooknum]);
> > else if (reg->hooknum == NF_NETDEV_INGRESS) {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS
> > if (reg->dev && dev_net(reg->dev) == net)
> > - hook_list = ®->dev->nf_hooks_ingress;
> > + hook_list =
> > + rcu_dereference(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress);
>
> Both of these should use nf_entry_dereference() to avoid the lockdep
> splat reported by kbuild robot:
>
> net/netfilter/core.c:75 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
> 2 locks held by swapper/1:
> #0: (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81c2e567>] rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20
> #1: (nf_hook_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81c58fcb>] nf_register_net_hook+0xcb/0x240
Aaron, please, send a v2.
I have a patchset that changes the footprint of the hook function as
it was discussed during the last Netfilter Workshop that clashes with
this.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-11 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-30 21:19 [PATCH nf-next 0/3] Compact netfilter hooks list Aaron Conole
2016-06-30 21:19 ` [PATCH nf-next 1/3] netfilter: bridge: add and use br_nf_hook_thresh Aaron Conole
2016-06-30 21:19 ` [PATCH nf-next 2/3] netfilter: call nf_hook_state_init with rcu_read_lock held Aaron Conole
2016-06-30 21:19 ` [PATCH nf-next 3/3] netfilter: replace list_head with single linked list Aaron Conole
2016-07-08 23:30 ` Florian Westphal
2016-07-11 10:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2016-07-11 18:56 ` Aaron Conole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160711102931.GA18199@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=aconole@bytheb.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).