From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: "Anders K. Pedersen" <akp@akp.dk>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nftables: Dynamically updating sets gives syntax error
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:22:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160712152207.GA2275@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467468776.1011.14.camel@akp.dk>
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 04:12:56PM +0200, Anders K. Pedersen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On lør, 2016-06-25 at 15:30 +0200, Anders K. Pedersen wrote:
> > With nftables 0.6 I'm getting a syntax error, when I try to use the
> > feature that was introduced
> > by http://git.netfilter.org/nftables/commit
> > /?id=a9467e55973b10c2e8fe37525514c961580f8506 . For example:
> >
> > # nft filter input set add tcp dport @myset
> > <cmdline>:1:26-30: Error: syntax error, unexpected dport
> > filter input set add tcp dport @myset
> > ^^^^^
> > # nft filter input set add ip saddr timeout 10s @myset
> > <cmdline>:1:25-29: Error: syntax error, unexpected saddr
> > filter input set add ip saddr timeout 10s @myset
> > ^^^^^
> > # nft filter input set update ip saddr timeout 10s @myset
> > <cmdline>:1:28-32: Error: syntax error, unexpected saddr
> > filter input set update ip saddr timeout 10s @myset
> > ^^^^^
>
> I did a git bisect on this and found that it was broken by
>
> commit a3e60492a684be09374d0649735da42bdadc6b48
> Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> Date: Sun Dec 27 22:15:17 2015 +0100
>
> parser: restrict relational rhs expression recursion
>
> After studying it a bit I reverted a part of it with the following
> change, which made the commands above work again:
>
> --- a/src/parser_bison.y
> +++ b/src/parser_bison.y
> @@ -2054,7 +2054,7 @@ set_elem_option : TIMEOUT time_spec
> }
> ;
>
> -set_lhs_expr : concat_rhs_expr
> +set_lhs_expr : concat_expr
> | multiton_rhs_expr
> ;
>
> The commit message indicated that it intended to handle rhs
> expressions, but this is a lhs expression, so maybe this change was
> unintended?
Thanks for reporting. This results however in shift/reduce conflicts
in the grammar, just sent patches to address this:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/647448/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/647447/
Please, test and let me know if this works for you. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-12 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1466861422.29189.75.camel@akp.dk>
2016-07-02 14:12 ` nftables: Dynamically updating sets gives syntax error Anders K. Pedersen
2016-07-12 15:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2016-07-13 7:14 ` Anders K. Pedersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160712152207.GA2275@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=akp@akp.dk \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).