From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: connlabels: move set helper to xt_connlabel
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:09:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160722150926.GA21470@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469098277-1227-3-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de>
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:51:17PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> xt_connlabel is the only user so move it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> ---
> include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.h | 2 --
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c | 17 -----------------
> net/netfilter/xt_connlabel.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> @@ -40,10 +32,21 @@ connlabel_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct xt_action_param *par)
> if (ct == NULL || nf_ct_is_untracked(ct))
> return invert;
>
> - if (info->options & XT_CONNLABEL_OP_SET)
> - return (nf_connlabel_set(ct, info->bit) == 0) ^ invert;
> + labels = nf_ct_labels_find(ct);
> + if (!labels)
> + return invert;
> +
> + if (test_bit(info->bit, labels->bits))
> + return !invert;
> +
> + if (info->options & XT_CONNLABEL_OP_SET) {
> + if (!test_and_set_bit(info->bit, labels->bits))
> + nf_conntrack_event_cache(IPCT_LABEL, ct);
> +
> + return !invert;
> + }
This patch inverts the existing logic, right? So this is first testing
for the bit, then setting it.
Before this patch, I remember because of what we discussed wrt. the
translation to nftables, was actually the opposite.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-22 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-21 10:51 netfilter: connlabels: get rid of variable-size support Florian Westphal
2016-07-21 10:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: conntrack: support a fixed size of 128 distinct labels Florian Westphal
2016-07-23 10:27 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-07-21 10:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: connlabels: move set helper to xt_connlabel Florian Westphal
2016-07-22 15:09 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2016-07-22 15:17 ` Florian Westphal
2016-07-23 10:27 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160722150926.GA21470@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).