From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: ctnetlink: reject new conntrack request with different l4proto Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:36:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20160810083657.GC31312@salvia> References: <1470665426-20973-1-git-send-email-zlpnobody@163.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Liping Zhang To: Liping Zhang Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:47910 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752259AbcHJSFU (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:05:20 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D72A416B for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:37:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C41FF2D4 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:37:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B385FAB5F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:37:14 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1470665426-20973-1-git-send-email-zlpnobody@163.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:10:26PM +0800, Liping Zhang wrote: > From: Liping Zhang > > Currently, user can add a conntrack with different l4proto via nfnetlink. > For example, original tuple is TCP while reply tuple is SCTP. This is > invalid combination, we should report EINVAL to userspace. Also applied, thanks.