From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 nf-next 4/7] netfilter: conntrack: add gc worker to remove timed-out entries
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:50:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160824235019.GA19546@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472070642.14381.120.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 22:11 +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 13:55 +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > > Conntrack gc worker to evict stale entries.
> > >
> > >
> > > > static struct nf_conn *
> > > > __nf_conntrack_alloc(struct net *net,
> > > > const struct nf_conntrack_zone *zone,
> > > > @@ -1527,6 +1597,7 @@ static int untrack_refs(void)
> > > >
> > > > void nf_conntrack_cleanup_start(void)
> > > > {
> > > > + conntrack_gc_work.exiting = true;
> > > > RCU_INIT_POINTER(ip_ct_attach, NULL);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1536,6 +1607,9 @@ void nf_conntrack_cleanup_end(void)
> > > > while (untrack_refs() > 0)
> > > > schedule();
> > > >
> > > > + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&conntrack_gc_work.dwork);
> > > > + /* can be re-scheduled once */
> > >
> > > Are you sure ?
> > >
> > > As conntrack_gc_work.exiting = true, I do not see how this can happen ?
> >
> > nf_conntrack_cleanup_start() sets exiting = true
> >
> > current cpu blocks in
> >
> > cancel_delayed_work_sync(&conntrack_gc_work.dwork);
> >
> > Iff the work queue was running on other cpu but was already past
> > gc_work->exiting check then when cancel_delayed_work_sync() (first one)
> > returns it will have re-armed itself via schedule_delayed_work().
> >
> > So I think the 2nd cancel_delayed_work_sync is needed.
> >
> > Let me know if you'd like to see a v3 with more verbose
> > comment about this.
>
> If you were using cancel_delayed_work() (instead of
> cancel_delayed_work_sync()) I would understand the concern.
>
> But here you are using the thing that was designed to exactly avoid the
> issue, of both work running on another cpu and/or re-arming itself.
>
> If what you are saying was true, we would have to fix hundreds of
> cancel_delayed_work_sync() call sites ...
Ok, I see, the _sync version indeed seems to be desgined to
suppress/avoid re-arming.
I will send a v3 without the 2nd cancel_delayed_work_sync, thanks Eric!
(I will preserve/add your Acked-by tags to the unchanged patches so you
won't need to resend them).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-25 5:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-24 11:55 [PATCH nf-next v2 0/7] netfilter: get rid of per-object conntrack timers Florian Westphal
2016-08-24 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 nf-next 1/7] netfilter: don't rely on DYING bit to detect when destroy event was sent Florian Westphal
2016-08-24 17:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-24 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 nf-next 2/7] netfilter: conntrack: get rid of conntrack timer Florian Westphal
2016-08-24 17:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-24 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 nf-next 3/7] netfilter: evict stale entries on netlink dumps Florian Westphal
2016-08-24 17:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-24 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 nf-next 4/7] netfilter: conntrack: add gc worker to remove timed-out entries Florian Westphal
2016-08-24 17:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-24 20:11 ` Florian Westphal
2016-08-24 20:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-08-24 23:50 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2016-08-24 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 nf-next 5/7] netfilter: conntrack: resched gc again if eviction rate is high Florian Westphal
2016-08-24 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 nf-next 6/7] netfilter: remove __nf_ct_kill_acct helper Florian Westphal
2016-08-24 11:55 ` [PATCH nf-next 7/7] netfilter: restart search if moved to other chain Florian Westphal
2016-08-24 13:20 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160824235019.GA19546@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).