From: Laura Garcia <nevola@gmail.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: nf_tables: Ensure u8 attributes are loaded from u32 within the bounds
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 20:23:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160922182351.GA8434@sonyv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160922145836.GA15625@salvia>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 04:58:36PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:00:02PM +0200, Laura Garcia Liebana wrote:
> > Check storage of u32 netlink attributes in smaller resources. This
> > validation is usually required when the u32 netlink attributes are being
> > stored in a private structure size of u8 in the kernel.
>
> Applied with changes, no need to resend. If I break anything, just
> follow up on top.
>
> I have rewritten this description and the documentation on the code a bit.
>
> More changes:
>
> > 4da449a ("netfilter: nft_exthdr: Add size check on u8 nft_exthdr
> > attributes")
>
> Always use 12 bytes commit-ids. 4da449a is too short, given the number
> of changes we're getting in the kernel tree, this may become ambiguous
> at some point so it won't be unique.
>
> You can achieve this via: git log --oneline --abbrev=12
>
> More comments below.
>
> > Suggested-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Laura Garcia Liebana <nevola@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h | 2 ++
> > net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> > net/netfilter/nft_cmp.c | 6 +++++-
> > net/netfilter/nft_exthdr.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> > net/netfilter/nft_immediate.c | 4 ++++
> > 7 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> > index f2f1339..608130f 100644
> > --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> > +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> > @@ -127,6 +127,8 @@ static inline enum nft_registers nft_type_to_reg(enum nft_data_types type)
> > return type == NFT_DATA_VERDICT ? NFT_REG_VERDICT : NFT_REG_1 * NFT_REG_SIZE / NFT_REG32_SIZE;
> > }
> >
> > +unsigned int nft_parse_u32_check(const struct nlattr *attr, int maxlen,
> > + u32 *dest);
>
> I have renamed maxlen to max, so this fits in one line.
>
> > unsigned int nft_parse_register(const struct nlattr *attr);
> > int nft_dump_register(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int attr, unsigned int reg);
> >
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> > index 7e1c876..d7b000f 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> > @@ -4343,6 +4343,32 @@ static int nf_tables_check_loops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > + * nft_parse_u32_check - parse a u32 value to store the value into a
> > + * smaller resource.
> > + *
> > + * @attr: netlink attribute
> > + * @maxlen: maximum value to be stored in dest
> > + * @dest: pointer to the resource
> > + *
> > + * Parse and store a given u32 value into a resource. Returns an error
> > + * ERANGE if the value will overload the maxlen, otherwise a 0 will be
> > + * returned and the value is stored into dest.
>
> I've rewritten this a bit.
>
> > + */
> > +unsigned int nft_parse_u32_check(const struct nlattr *attr, int maxlen,
>
> I have rename maxlen to max. Probably maxval would have been better,
> anyway.
>
> > + u32 *dest)
> > +{
> > + int reg;
>
> Variable names are important, they provide context when reading the
> code. Look, from the 'reg' name it seems we're fetching a register.
> However, we are obtaining a value, so I renamed this to val. Try to
> select the right name next time.
>
> > +
> > + reg = ntohl(nla_get_be32(attr));
> > + if (reg > maxlen)
> > + return -ERANGE;
> > +
> > + *dest = reg;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nft_parse_u32_check);
> > +
> > +/**
> > * nft_parse_register - parse a register value from a netlink attribute
> > *
> > * @attr: netlink attribute
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c b/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
> > index d71cc18..e7f23a1 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > #include <linux/netlink.h>
> > #include <linux/netfilter.h>
> > #include <linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h>
> > +#include <linux/static_key.h>
> > #include <net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.h>
> > #include <net/netfilter/nf_tables.h>
> >
> > @@ -52,6 +53,7 @@ static int nft_bitwise_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
> > {
> > struct nft_bitwise *priv = nft_expr_priv(expr);
> > struct nft_data_desc d1, d2;
> > + u32 len;
> > int err;
> >
> > if (tb[NFTA_BITWISE_SREG] == NULL ||
> > @@ -61,7 +63,13 @@ static int nft_bitwise_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
> > tb[NFTA_BITWISE_XOR] == NULL)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - priv->len = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_BITWISE_LEN]));
> > + err = nft_parse_u32_check(tb[NFTA_BITWISE_LEN], U8_MAX,
> > + &len);
> ^^^^
>
> This line break was unnecessary. We can have lines 80-chars long, and
> for some reason you broken the line before the limit. I have repaired
> this.
>
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + priv->len = len;
> > +
> > priv->sreg = nft_parse_register(tb[NFTA_BITWISE_SREG]);
> > err = nft_validate_register_load(priv->sreg, priv->len);
> > if (err < 0)
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c b/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c
> > index b78c28b..8cac219 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c
> > @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ static int nft_byteorder_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
> > const struct nlattr * const tb[])
> > {
> > struct nft_byteorder *priv = nft_expr_priv(expr);
> > + u32 size, len;
> > int err;
> >
> > if (tb[NFTA_BYTEORDER_SREG] == NULL ||
> > @@ -117,7 +118,13 @@ static int nft_byteorder_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > - priv->size = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_BYTEORDER_SIZE]));
> > + err = nft_parse_u32_check(tb[NFTA_BYTEORDER_SIZE], U8_MAX,
> > + &size);
>
> Same here, and everywhere else.
>
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + priv->size = size;
> > +
> > switch (priv->size) {
> > case 2:
> > case 4:
> > @@ -128,7 +135,13 @@ static int nft_byteorder_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
> > }
> >
> > priv->sreg = nft_parse_register(tb[NFTA_BYTEORDER_SREG]);
> > - priv->len = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_BYTEORDER_LEN]));
> > + err = nft_parse_u32_check(tb[NFTA_BYTEORDER_LEN], U8_MAX,
> > + &len);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + priv->len = len;
> > +
> > err = nft_validate_register_load(priv->sreg, priv->len);
> > if (err < 0)
> > return err;
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_cmp.c b/net/netfilter/nft_cmp.c
> > index e25b35d..3d31432 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nft_cmp.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_cmp.c
> > @@ -84,8 +84,12 @@ static int nft_cmp_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr,
> > if (err < 0)
> > return err;
> >
> > - priv->op = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_CMP_OP]));
> > + if (desc.len > U8_MAX)
> > + return -ERANGE;
> > priv->len = desc.len;
> > +
> > + priv->op = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_CMP_OP]));
>
> Look, this line has moved for no reason. This just adds noise to the
> patch, so modify only the code that you strictly need, to get it
> smaller.
The reason of this movement was to return the error as soon as possible.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-22 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-14 13:00 [PATCH nf] netfilter: nf_tables: Ensure u8 attributes are loaded from u32 within the bounds Laura Garcia Liebana
2016-09-22 14:58 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-09-22 15:02 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-09-22 16:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-22 18:33 ` Laura Garcia
2016-09-22 18:23 ` Laura Garcia [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160922182351.GA8434@sonyv \
--to=nevola@gmail.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).