* Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 27
[not found] <20160927164026.741b290b@canb.auug.org.au>
@ 2016-09-27 10:03 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-04 0:48 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2016-09-27 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aaron Conole
Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Stephen Rothwell, Florian Westphal,
Pablo Neira Ayuso, netdev, netfilter-devel, Sergey Senozhatsky,
Sergey Senozhatsky
Hello,
On (09/27/16 16:40), Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Changes since 20160923:
>
seems that commit e3b37f11e6e4e6b6 ("netfilter: replace list_head with
single linked list") breaks the build on !CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS systems
accessing ->nf_hooks_ingress
static void nf_set_hooks_head(struct net *net, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg,
struct nf_hook_entry *entry)
{
switch (reg->pf) {
case NFPROTO_NETDEV:
/* We already checked in nf_register_net_hook() that this is
* used from ingress.
*/
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
log:
In file included from ./include/linux/linkage.h:4:0,
from ./include/linux/kernel.h:6,
from net/netfilter/core.c:10:
net/netfilter/core.c: In function ‘nf_set_hooks_head’:
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:322:17: note: in definition of macro ‘WRITE_ONCE’
union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u = \
^
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:323:30: note: in definition of macro ‘WRITE_ONCE’
{ .__val = (__force typeof(x)) (val) }; \
^
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:323:35: note: in definition of macro ‘WRITE_ONCE’
{ .__val = (__force typeof(x)) (val) }; \
^~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:324:22: note: in definition of macro ‘WRITE_ONCE’
__write_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); \
^
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:324:42: note: in definition of macro ‘WRITE_ONCE’
__write_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); \
^
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/linkage.h:4:0,
from ./include/linux/kernel.h:6,
from net/netfilter/core.c:10:
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:498:19: note: in definition of macro ‘__compiletime_assert’
bool __cond = !(condition); \
^~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:518:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘_compiletime_assert’
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:521:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert’
compiletime_assert(__native_word(t), \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:521:21: note: in expansion of macro ‘__native_word’
compiletime_assert(__native_word(t), \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
./arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h:64:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert_atomic_type’
compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/barrier.h:157:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘__smp_store_release’
#define smp_store_release(p, v) __smp_store_release(p, v)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:668:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘smp_store_release’
smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:498:19: note: in definition of macro ‘__compiletime_assert’
bool __cond = !(condition); \
^~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:518:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘_compiletime_assert’
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:521:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert’
compiletime_assert(__native_word(t), \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:521:21: note: in expansion of macro ‘__native_word’
compiletime_assert(__native_word(t), \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
./arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h:64:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert_atomic_type’
compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/barrier.h:157:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘__smp_store_release’
#define smp_store_release(p, v) __smp_store_release(p, v)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:668:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘smp_store_release’
smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:498:19: note: in definition of macro ‘__compiletime_assert’
bool __cond = !(condition); \
^~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:518:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘_compiletime_assert’
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:521:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert’
compiletime_assert(__native_word(t), \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:521:21: note: in expansion of macro ‘__native_word’
compiletime_assert(__native_word(t), \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
./arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h:64:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert_atomic_type’
compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/barrier.h:157:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘__smp_store_release’
#define smp_store_release(p, v) __smp_store_release(p, v)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:668:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘smp_store_release’
smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:498:19: note: in definition of macro ‘__compiletime_assert’
bool __cond = !(condition); \
^~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:518:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘_compiletime_assert’
_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:521:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert’
compiletime_assert(__native_word(t), \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/compiler.h:521:21: note: in expansion of macro ‘__native_word’
compiletime_assert(__native_word(t), \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
./arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h:64:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘compiletime_assert_atomic_type’
compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/barrier.h:157:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘__smp_store_release’
#define smp_store_release(p, v) __smp_store_release(p, v)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:668:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘smp_store_release’
smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/linkage.h:4:0,
from ./include/linux/kernel.h:6,
from net/netfilter/core.c:10:
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:322:17: note: in definition of macro ‘WRITE_ONCE’
union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u = \
^
./include/asm-generic/barrier.h:157:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘__smp_store_release’
#define smp_store_release(p, v) __smp_store_release(p, v)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:668:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘smp_store_release’
smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:323:30: note: in definition of macro ‘WRITE_ONCE’
{ .__val = (__force typeof(x)) (val) }; \
^
./include/asm-generic/barrier.h:157:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘__smp_store_release’
#define smp_store_release(p, v) __smp_store_release(p, v)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:668:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘smp_store_release’
smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:323:35: note: in definition of macro ‘WRITE_ONCE’
{ .__val = (__force typeof(x)) (val) }; \
^~~
./include/asm-generic/barrier.h:157:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘__smp_store_release’
#define smp_store_release(p, v) __smp_store_release(p, v)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:668:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘smp_store_release’
smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:668:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘RCU_INITIALIZER’
smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:323:35: note: in definition of macro ‘WRITE_ONCE’
{ .__val = (__force typeof(x)) (val) }; \
^~~
./include/asm-generic/barrier.h:157:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘__smp_store_release’
#define smp_store_release(p, v) __smp_store_release(p, v)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:668:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘smp_store_release’
smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:668:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘RCU_INITIALIZER’
smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:324:22: note: in definition of macro ‘WRITE_ONCE’
__write_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); \
^
./include/asm-generic/barrier.h:157:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘__smp_store_release’
#define smp_store_release(p, v) __smp_store_release(p, v)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:668:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘smp_store_release’
smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:30: error: ‘struct net_device’ has no member named ‘nf_hooks_ingress’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^
./include/linux/compiler.h:324:42: note: in definition of macro ‘WRITE_ONCE’
__write_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); \
^
./include/asm-generic/barrier.h:157:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘__smp_store_release’
#define smp_store_release(p, v) __smp_store_release(p, v)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/rcupdate.h:668:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘smp_store_release’
smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER((typeof(p))_r_a_p__v)); \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘rcu_assign_pointer’
rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CC net/ipv4/ip_fragment.o
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:290: net/netfilter/core.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:475: net/netfilter] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
-ss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 27
2016-09-27 10:03 ` linux-next: Tree for Sep 27 Sergey Senozhatsky
@ 2016-10-04 0:48 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-05 20:56 ` error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nf_hooks_ingress' Michal Sojka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2016-10-04 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aaron Conole
Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Stephen Rothwell, Florian Westphal,
Pablo Neira Ayuso, netdev, netfilter-devel, Sergey Senozhatsky,
Sergey Senozhatsky
On (09/27/16 19:03), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (09/27/16 16:40), Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Changes since 20160923:
> >
>
> seems that commit e3b37f11e6e4e6b6 ("netfilter: replace list_head with
> single linked list") breaks the build on !CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS systems
> accessing ->nf_hooks_ingress
>
> static void nf_set_hooks_head(struct net *net, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg,
> struct nf_hook_entry *entry)
> {
> switch (reg->pf) {
> case NFPROTO_NETDEV:
> /* We already checked in nf_register_net_hook() that this is
> * used from ingress.
> */
> rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
so I see two commits in linux-next now that fix the commit in question in
two patches
: commit 7816ec564ec40ae20bb7925f733a181cad0cc491 ("netfilter: accommodate
: different kconfig in nf_set_hooks_head")
:
: When CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS is unset (or no), we need to handle
: the request for registration properly by dropping the hook. This
: releases the entry during the set.
:
: Fixes: e3b37f11e6e4 ("netfilter: replace list_head with single linked list")
and
: commit 5119e4381a90fabd3442bde02707cbd9e5d7367a ("netfilter: Fix potential
: null pointer dereference")
:
: It's possible for nf_hook_entry_head to return NULL. If two
: nf_unregister_net_hook calls happen simultaneously with a single hook
: entry in the list, both will enter the nf_hook_mutex critical section.
: The first will successfully delete the head, but the second will see
: this NULL pointer and attempt to dereference.
:
: This fix ensures that no null pointer dereference could occur when such
: a condition happens.
:
: Fixes: e3b37f11e6e4 ("netfilter: replace list_head with single linked list")
do you guys plan to fold those into "e3b37f11e6e4" (a preferred way)
or will send it out as 3 separate patches (um, why) ?
-ss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nf_hooks_ingress'
2016-10-04 0:48 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
@ 2016-10-05 20:56 ` Michal Sojka
2016-10-05 21:11 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michal Sojka @ 2016-10-05 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Senozhatsky, Aaron Conole
Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Stephen Rothwell, Florian Westphal,
Pablo Neira Ayuso, netdev, netfilter-devel, Sergey Senozhatsky,
Sergey Senozhatsky
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 04 2016, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (09/27/16 19:03), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On (09/27/16 16:40), Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> >
>> > Changes since 20160923:
>> >
>>
>> seems that commit e3b37f11e6e4e6b6 ("netfilter: replace list_head with
>> single linked list") breaks the build on !CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS systems
>> accessing ->nf_hooks_ingress
this commit is now in mainline as
e3b37f11e6e4e6b6f02cc762f182ce233d2c1c9d and it breaks my build:
net/netfilter/core.c: In function 'nf_set_hooks_head':
net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nf_hooks_ingress'
Are the fixes (see below) on the way to mainline too?
Thanks.
-Michal
>>
>> static void nf_set_hooks_head(struct net *net, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg,
>> struct nf_hook_entry *entry)
>> {
>> switch (reg->pf) {
>> case NFPROTO_NETDEV:
>> /* We already checked in nf_register_net_hook() that this is
>> * used from ingress.
>> */
>> rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>
> so I see two commits in linux-next now that fix the commit in question in
> two patches
>
> : commit 7816ec564ec40ae20bb7925f733a181cad0cc491 ("netfilter: accommodate
> : different kconfig in nf_set_hooks_head")
> :
> : When CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS is unset (or no), we need to handle
> : the request for registration properly by dropping the hook. This
> : releases the entry during the set.
> :
> : Fixes: e3b37f11e6e4 ("netfilter: replace list_head with single linked list")
>
> and
>
> : commit 5119e4381a90fabd3442bde02707cbd9e5d7367a ("netfilter: Fix potential
> : null pointer dereference")
> :
> : It's possible for nf_hook_entry_head to return NULL. If two
> : nf_unregister_net_hook calls happen simultaneously with a single hook
> : entry in the list, both will enter the nf_hook_mutex critical section.
> : The first will successfully delete the head, but the second will see
> : this NULL pointer and attempt to dereference.
> :
> : This fix ensures that no null pointer dereference could occur when such
> : a condition happens.
> :
> : Fixes: e3b37f11e6e4 ("netfilter: replace list_head with single linked list")
>
>
> do you guys plan to fold those into "e3b37f11e6e4" (a preferred way)
> or will send it out as 3 separate patches (um, why) ?
>
> -ss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nf_hooks_ingress'
2016-10-05 20:56 ` error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nf_hooks_ingress' Michal Sojka
@ 2016-10-05 21:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-06 4:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2016-10-05 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky, Aaron Conole, linux-next, linux-kernel,
Stephen Rothwell, Florian Westphal, Pablo Neira Ayuso, netdev,
netfilter-devel, Sergey Senozhatsky
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 22:56 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> this commit is now in mainline as
> e3b37f11e6e4e6b6f02cc762f182ce233d2c1c9d and it breaks my build:
>
> net/netfilter/core.c: In function 'nf_set_hooks_head':
> net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nf_hooks_ingress'
>
> Are the fixes (see below) on the way to mainline too?
Yes the fixes are already in nf tree and _will_ get pushed.
Pablo and David are attending netdev 1.2 in Tokyo and have obligations.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/pablo/nf-next.git/
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nf_hooks_ingress'
2016-10-05 21:11 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2016-10-06 4:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2016-10-06 4:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: Michal Sojka, Sergey Senozhatsky, Aaron Conole, linux-next,
linux-kernel, Stephen Rothwell, Florian Westphal,
Pablo Neira Ayuso, netdev, netfilter-devel, Sergey Senozhatsky
On (10/06/16 06:11), Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 22:56 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
>
> > this commit is now in mainline as
> > e3b37f11e6e4e6b6f02cc762f182ce233d2c1c9d and it breaks my build:
> >
> > net/netfilter/core.c: In function 'nf_set_hooks_head':
> > net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nf_hooks_ingress'
> >
> > Are the fixes (see below) on the way to mainline too?
>
> Yes the fixes are already in nf tree and _will_ get pushed.
>
> Pablo and David are attending netdev 1.2 in Tokyo and have obligations.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/pablo/nf-next.git/
well, I did my best to avoid it, but the guys didn't even bother to
reply. pushing a knowingly broken patch that
a) kills the build
b) introduces a race
c) requires two "Fixes:" followup patches
to the main line despite the fact that those problems were discovered
at linux-next stage is totally un-cool.
-ss
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-06 4:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20160927164026.741b290b@canb.auug.org.au>
2016-09-27 10:03 ` linux-next: Tree for Sep 27 Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-04 0:48 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-05 20:56 ` error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nf_hooks_ingress' Michal Sojka
2016-10-05 21:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-06 4:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).