From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next,RFC 03/10] netfilter: bridge: kill NF_HOOK_THRESH() and state->tresh
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:21:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013152157.GA3124@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161013151055.GB20580@breakpoint.cc>
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:10:55PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:25:45PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > > > Patch c5136b15ea36 ("netfilter: bridge: add and use br_nf_hook_thresh")
> > > > introduced br_nf_hook_thresh().
> > > >
> > > > Replace NF_HOOK_THRESH() by br_nf_hook_thresh from
> > > > br_nf_forward_finish(), so we have no more callers for this macro.
> > > >
> > > > As a result, state->thresh and explicit thresh parameter in the hook
> > > > state structure is not required anymore.
> > > >
> > > > And we can get rid of fast forward code in nf_iterate() in the core path
> > > > that is only used by br_netfilter to search for the filter hook.
> > >
> > > Note that you will need to move more parts of nf_hook_slow() into
> > > br_nf_hook_thresh(); the bridge netfilter does need to thresh feature
> > > that we have in nf_iterate().
> >
> > br_nf_hook_thresh() is already skipping hooks before NF_BR_PRI_BRNF to
> > emulate thresh. What else is missing?
>
> AFAICS you are removing the NF_BR_PRI_BRNF skipping in this patch,
> it relied on nf_hook_slow to do this (plus the state->thresh thing).
int br_nf_hook_thresh(unsigned int hook, struct net *net,
struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct net_device *indev,
struct net_device *outdev,
int (*okfn)(struct net *, struct sock *,
struct sk_buff *))
{
struct nf_hook_entry *elem;
struct nf_hook_state state;
int ret;
elem = rcu_dereference(net->nf.hooks[NFPROTO_BRIDGE][hook]);
while (elem && (elem->ops.priority <= NF_BR_PRI_BRNF))
elem = rcu_dereference(elem->next);
...
nf_hook_state_init(&state, elem, hook, NFPROTO_BRIDGE, indev, ...
Hm, but this code (before actually calling nf_hook_slow) is skipping
the hook until we get to NF_BR_PRI_BRNF + 1.
Then hook state sets hook_entry to elem.
Am I missing anything?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-13 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 12:02 [PATCH nf-next,RFC 00/10] Netfilter core updates Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 01/10] netfilter: get rid of useless debugging from core Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 02/10] netfilter: remove comments that predate rcu days Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 03/10] netfilter: bridge: kill NF_HOOK_THRESH() and state->tresh Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:25 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-13 15:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 15:10 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-13 15:21 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2016-10-13 15:25 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 04/10] netfilter: deprecate NF_STOP Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 05/10] netfilter: x_tables: move hook state into xt_action_param structure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 06/10] netfilter: nf_tables: use hook state from " Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 07/10] netfilter: use switch() to handle verdict cases from nf_hook_slow() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 08/10] netfilter: move NF_QUEUE handling away from core Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:38 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-13 15:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 15:09 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-14 8:06 ` Liping Zhang
2016-10-14 9:53 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-14 10:28 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-14 15:38 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-14 16:47 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-14 17:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 09/10] netfilter: merge nf_iterate() into nf_hook_slow() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:02 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 10/10] netfilter: inline nf_hook_slow() and rename it to nf_hook_iterate() Pablo Neira Ayuso
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-13 12:11 [PATCH nf-next,RFC 00/10] Netfilter core updates Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-10-13 12:11 ` [PATCH nf-next,RFC 03/10] netfilter: bridge: kill NF_HOOK_THRESH() and state->tresh Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161013152157.GA3124@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).