From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Rebasing nf-next... Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 20:37:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20161101193700.GA17249@salvia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik , Arnd Bergmann , Florian Westphal To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:56544 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751135AbcKAThH (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:37:07 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF3E168381 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 20:37:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2037DA911 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 20:37:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5F4DA8EF for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 20:37:01 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, I'm rebasing nf-next because I found problems on the ipset batch. As part of the rebase, I'm going to squash this Arnd's patch: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/688615/ into original Florian's fib nf_tables expression patch. As well as this one: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/689267/ into the nf_socket lookup infrastructure. Given I'm rebasing, I don't think it's useful to keep those around after the rebase to upstream this to David's net-next. Sorry.