netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: connmark: ignore skbs with magic untracked conntrack objects
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 23:56:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161108225659.GA31249@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1477702910-12957-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de>

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 03:01:50AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> The (percpu) untracked conntrack entries can end up with nonzero connmarks.
> 
> The 'untracked' conntrack objects are merely a way to distinguish INVALID
> (i.e. protocol connection tracker says payload doesn't meet some
> requirements or packet was never seen by the connection tracking code)
> from packets that are intentionally not tracked (some icmpv6 types such as
> neigh solicitation, or by using 'iptables -j CT --notrack' option).
> 
> Untracked conntrack objects are implementation detail, we might as well use
> invalid magic address instead to tell INVALID and UNTRACKED apart.

We may consider recovering this old idea: https://lwn.net/Articles/141489/

> Check skb->nfct for untracked dummy and behave as if skb->nfct is NULL.
> 
> Reported-by: XU Tianwen <evan.xu.tianwen@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> ---
> Here is the formal submit of earlier RFC patch, I also fixed
> connmark match; conceptually UNTRACKED is not a conntrack object
> so such skb should always fail the match.

Applied, thanks.

      reply	other threads:[~2016-11-08 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-29  1:01 [PATCH nf] netfilter: connmark: ignore skbs with magic untracked conntrack objects Florian Westphal
2016-11-08 22:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161108225659.GA31249@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).