From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: nft_fib: convert htonl to ntohl properly Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 21:14:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20161204201402.GA32587@salvia> References: <1479910341-40744-1-git-send-email-zlpnobody@163.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, Liping Zhang To: Liping Zhang Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:32936 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751126AbcLDUOG (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2016 15:14:06 -0500 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC80B6C76 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 21:14:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA5FDA85F for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 21:14:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC70DA85F for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 21:14:03 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1479910341-40744-1-git-send-email-zlpnobody@163.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:12:20PM +0800, Liping Zhang wrote: > From: Liping Zhang > > Acctually ntohl and htonl are identical, so this doesn't affect > anything, but it is conceptually wrong. Applied, thanks Liping.