From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netfilter: nft_counter: rework atomic dump and reset
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 15:25:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161210142501.GA25221@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161210141655.GA19963@salvia>
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 03:16:55PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 03:05:41PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> [...]
> > -static void nft_counter_reset(struct nft_counter_percpu __percpu *counter,
> > - struct nft_counter *total)
> > -{
> > - struct nft_counter_percpu *cpu_stats;
> > - u64 bytes, packets;
> > - unsigned int seq;
> > - int cpu;
> > -
> > - memset(total, 0, sizeof(*total));
> > - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > - bytes = packets = 0;
> > -
> > - cpu_stats = per_cpu_ptr(counter, cpu);
> > - do {
> > - seq = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&cpu_stats->syncp);
> > - packets += __nft_counter_reset(&cpu_stats->counter.packets);
> > - bytes += __nft_counter_reset(&cpu_stats->counter.bytes);
> > - } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&cpu_stats->syncp, seq));
> > -
> > - total->packets += packets;
> > - total->bytes += bytes;
> > + seq = read_seqcount_begin(myseq);
> > + bytes = this_cpu->bytes;
> > + packets = this_cpu->packets;
> > + } while (read_seqcount_retry(myseq, seq));
> > +
> > + total->bytes += bytes;
> > + total->packets += packets;
> > +
> > + if (reset) {
> > + local_bh_disable();
> > + this_cpu->packets -= packets;
> > + this_cpu->bytes -= bytes;
> > + local_bh_enable();
> > + }
>
> Actually this is not right either, Eric proposed this instead:
>
> static void nft_counter_reset(struct nft_counter_percpu __percpu *counter,
> struct nft_counter *total)
> {
> struct nft_counter_percpu *cpu_stats;
>
> local_bh_disable();
> cpu_stats = this_cpu_ptr(counter);
> cpu_stats->counter.packets -= total->packets;
> cpu_stats->counter.bytes -= total->bytes;
> local_bh_enable();
> }
>
> The cpu that running over the reset code is guaranteed to own this
> stats exclusively, but this is not guaranteed by my patch.
>
> I'm going to send a v2. I think I need to turn packet and byte
> counters into s64, otherwise a sufficient large total->packets may
> underflow and confuse stats.
So my plan is to fold this incremental change on this patch and send a
v2.
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_counter.c b/net/netfilter/nft_counter.c
index c37983d0a141..5647feb43f43 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_counter.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_counter.c
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
#include <net/netfilter/nf_tables.h>
struct nft_counter {
- u64 bytes;
- u64 packets;
+ s64 bytes;
+ s64 packets;
};
struct nft_counter_percpu_priv {
@@ -102,8 +102,20 @@ static void nft_counter_obj_destroy(struct nft_object *obj)
nft_counter_do_destroy(priv);
}
+static void nft_counter_reset(struct nft_counter_percpu_priv __percpu *priv,
+ struct nft_counter *total)
+{
+ struct nft_counter *this_cpu;
+
+ local_bh_disable();
+ this_cpu = this_cpu_ptr(priv->counter);
+ this_cpu->packets -= total->packets;
+ this_cpu->bytes -= total->bytes;
+ local_bh_enable();
+}
+
static void nft_counter_fetch(struct nft_counter_percpu_priv *priv,
- struct nft_counter *total, bool reset)
+ struct nft_counter *total)
{
struct nft_counter *this_cpu;
const seqcount_t *myseq;
@@ -123,13 +135,6 @@ static void nft_counter_fetch(struct nft_counter_percpu_priv *priv,
total->bytes += bytes;
total->packets += packets;
-
- if (reset) {
- local_bh_disable();
- this_cpu->packets -= packets;
- this_cpu->bytes -= bytes;
- local_bh_enable();
- }
}
}
@@ -139,7 +144,9 @@ static int nft_counter_do_dump(struct sk_buff
*skb,
{
struct nft_counter total;
- nft_counter_fetch(priv, &total, reset);
+ nft_counter_fetch(priv, &total);
+ if (reset)
+ nft_counter_reset(priv, &total);
if (nla_put_be64(skb, NFTA_COUNTER_BYTES,
cpu_to_be64(total.bytes),
NFTA_COUNTER_PAD) ||
@@ -218,7 +225,7 @@ static int nft_counter_clone(struct nft_expr *dst,
const struct nft_expr *src)
struct nft_counter *this_cpu;
struct nft_counter total;
- nft_counter_fetch(priv, &total, false);
+ nft_counter_fetch(priv, &total);
cpu_stats = alloc_percpu_gfp(struct nft_counter, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (cpu_stats == NULL)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-10 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-10 14:05 [PATCH net-next] netfilter: nft_counter: rework atomic dump and reset Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-12-10 14:16 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-12-10 14:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2016-12-10 15:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-11 10:41 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-12-11 10:43 Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-12-11 15:02 ` David Miller
2016-12-11 15:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161210142501.GA25221@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).