From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Pau Espin Pedrol <pau.espin@tessares.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, pespin.shar@gmail.com,
Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use fwmark_reflect in nf_send_reset
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:16:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161223141628.GA20986@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1481882607-461-1-git-send-email-pau.espin@tessares.net>
Hi Pau,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:03:27AM +0100, Pau Espin Pedrol wrote:
> Otherwise, RST packets generated by ipt_REJECT always have mark 0 when
> the routing is checked later in the same code path.
Your patch works fine, I can see mark is reflected to TCP RST for
packets that are generated by netfilter.
However, it seems fwmark_reflect is broken here for TCP RST that are
generated by the stack, or at least I don't manage to trigger the
reflection with current git tree.
Using this simple ruleset to mark input packets:
# nft list ruleset
table ip x {
chain y {
type filter hook output priority 0; policy accept;
log prefix "output: "
}
chain z {
type filter hook input priority 0; policy accept;
mark set 0x00000001
log prefix "input: "
}
}
Note input packets shows mark 0x1:
Dec 23 15:07:37 salvia kernel: [14895.204591] input: IN=eth0 OUT=
MAC=... SRC=192.168.12.1 DST=192.168.12.195 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=27691 DF
PROTO=TCP SPT=36341 DPT=24 WINDOW=14600 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 MARK=0x1
however, output shows no mark, so no reflection is going on:
Dec 23 15:07:37 salvia kernel: [14895.204643] output: IN= OUT=eth0
SRC=192.168.12.195 DST=192.168.12.1 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64
ID=52846 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=24 DPT=36341 WINDOW=0 RES=0x00 ACK RST
URGP=0
fwmark_reflect works perfectly fine with ICMP:
Dec 23 15:11:21 salvia kernel: [15119.556780] input: IN=eth0 OUT=
MAC=... SRC=192.168.12.1 DST=192.168.12.195 LEN=84 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=ICMP
TYPE=8 CODE=0 ID=5429 SEQ=2 MARK=0x1
Dec 23 15:11:21 salvia kernel: [15119.556822] output: IN= OUT=eth0
SRC=192.168.2.195 DST=192.168.2.1 LEN=84 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64
ID=25617 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=0 CODE=0 ID=5429 SEQ=2 MARK=0x1
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-23 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-15 12:43 [PATCH] netfilter: use fwmark_reflect in nf_send_reset Pau Espin Pedrol
2016-12-15 20:27 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-12-16 10:03 ` Pau Espin Pedrol
2016-12-23 14:16 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2016-12-27 21:51 ` Pau Espin Pedrol
2017-01-05 11:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-01-06 19:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Pau Espin Pedrol
2017-01-06 19:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tcp: fix mark propagation with fwmark_reflect enabled Pau Espin Pedrol
2017-01-09 17:00 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-01-09 17:23 ` David Miller
2017-01-09 16:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] netfilter: use fwmark_reflect in nf_send_reset Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161223141628.GA20986@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=lorenzo@google.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pau.espin@tessares.net \
--cc=pespin.shar@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).