From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH] examples: Remove the use of nftnl_mnl_batch_put() Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:40:39 +0100 Message-ID: <20170116104039.GA7993@salvia> References: <20170112192255.GA20246@lennorien.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Elise Lennion Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:46204 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750849AbdAPKku (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 05:40:50 -0500 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856E0E8385 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:40:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7766DA8257 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:40:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B97FF6FC for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:40:44 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170112192255.GA20246@lennorien.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 05:22:55PM -0200, Elise Lennion wrote: > use nftnl_batch_begin() and nftnl_batch_end() instead, to keep examples > consistent and avoid code duplication. Applied, thanks Elise.