From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Victor Julien <lists@inliniac.net>
Cc: Netfilter Development Mailing list <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tcp state in conntrack destroy events
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:28:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117212807.GC12001@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fdd3eb50-75d3-32e1-d7a0-f333050aece5@inliniac.net>
Victor Julien <lists@inliniac.net> wrote:
> I was hoping to get the last TCP state in a conntrack destroy event,
> however it seems to be unavailable.
>
> Through libnetfilter_conntrack the value retrieved at ATTR_TCP_STATE is
> always 0.
>
> Using the conntrack command I see the same behavior:
>
> destroy doesn't have it (conntrack -E -e destroy -p tcp):
>
> [DESTROY] tcp 6 src=218.65.30.38 dst=192.168.178.254 sport=61063
> dport=22 packets=11 bytes=820 src=192.168.0.123 dst=218.65.30.38
> sport=22 dport=61063 packets=8 bytes=424 [ASSURED] mark=3 delta-time=77
>
> update does (conntrack -E -e updates -p tcp):
>
> [UPDATE] tcp 6 120 FIN_WAIT src=192.168.0.53 dst=x.x.x.x
> sport=52958 dport=443 src=x.x.x.x dst=192.168.178.254 sport=443
> dport=52958 [ASSURED] mark=3
>
> Is this intentional? My goal is to create connection log that includes a
> hint about why the connection is gone.
Yes, its intentional, see
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c, there is a check for DESTROY
that supresses most of the extra info:
682 if (events & (1 << IPCT_DESTROY)) {
683 if (ctnetlink_dump_acct(skb, ct, type) < 0 ||
684 ctnetlink_dump_timestamp(skb, ct) < 0)
685 goto nla_put_failure;
686 } else {
..
/* IPCT_PROTOINFO */
Pablo made this change in 7b621c1ea64a54f77b8a841b16dc4c9fee3ecf48,
i guess the rationale was that clients aren't interested in this
on DESTROY.
Would be easy to change this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-17 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-17 19:46 tcp state in conntrack destroy events Victor Julien
2017-01-17 21:28 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-01-17 21:39 ` Victor Julien
2017-01-17 23:23 ` Jarno Rajahalme
2017-01-17 23:47 ` Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170117212807.GC12001@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=lists@inliniac.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).