From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@ovn.org>,
Victor Julien <lists@inliniac.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: ctnetlink: make more information available in DESTROY events
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:07:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170118150745.GG12001@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170118150118.GA23289@salvia>
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 03:54:32PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > destroy events currently don't contain the tcp state info and no
> > secmark and conntrack labels.
> >
> > Quoting Victor:
> > "I was hoping to get the last TCP state in a conntrack destroy event,
> > however it seems to be unavailable."
> >
> > Quoting Jarno:
> > "I have a use case where we want to log terminating connections, but
> > only if a specific label bit is set."
> >
> > While at it, also include SECMARK in destroy events if one is available.
>
> I'm fine with this.
>
> But to remember the original problem is that netlink bandwidth is
> limited, so the more we load the netlink message, the more chances we
> have to hit ENOBUFS.
>
> connlabel is optional, so you only get it if needed.
Yes, and only if there was a label change or at least one label bit is
set.
> But the protoinfo thing, I would prefer we just dump the state given
> this the usecase we have now.
>
> Probably extend ->to_nlattr() to have a bool that indicates if this is
> a dump?
Could do that by it only avoids 4 attributes (so we only save 32bytes
per message).
If you still think its worth it I'll resend a v2 without the dump change
and will send do a followup change that flags the requested event dump
to the protocol backend.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-18 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-18 14:54 [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: ctnetlink: make more information available in DESTROY events Florian Westphal
2017-01-18 15:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-01-18 15:07 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-01-18 16:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-01-18 16:18 ` Florian Westphal
2017-01-20 7:51 ` Victor Julien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170118150745.GG12001@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=jarno@ovn.org \
--cc=lists@inliniac.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).