* [PATCH nf-next v2 1/1] netfilter: nf_tables: Refine the codes to eliminate useless condition checks in nf_tables_api.c
@ 2017-01-16 14:02 fgao
2017-01-18 20:11 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: fgao @ 2017-01-16 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pablo, netfilter-devel; +Cc: gfree.wind, Gao Feng
From: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
The return value of nf_tables_table_lookup is valid pointer or one
pointer error. There are two cases totally.
case1: IS_ERR(table) is true, it would return the error or reset the
table as NULL, it is unnecessary to perform the latter check
"table != NULL".
case2: IS_ERR(obj) is false, the table is one valid pointer. It is also
unnecessary to perform that check.
The nf_tables_newset and nf_tables_newobj have same logic codes.
In summary, we could move the block of condition check "table != NULL"
in the else block to eliminate the original condition checks.
Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
---
v2: Remove the "table = NULL" assignment, per Pablo
v1: Initial version
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 15 +++------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index a019a87..6e07c21 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -696,10 +696,7 @@ static int nf_tables_newtable(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
if (IS_ERR(table)) {
if (PTR_ERR(table) != -ENOENT)
return PTR_ERR(table);
- table = NULL;
- }
-
- if (table != NULL) {
+ } else {
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL)
return -EEXIST;
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE)
@@ -2963,10 +2960,7 @@ static int nf_tables_newset(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
if (IS_ERR(set)) {
if (PTR_ERR(set) != -ENOENT)
return PTR_ERR(set);
- set = NULL;
- }
-
- if (set != NULL) {
+ } else {
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL)
return -EEXIST;
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE)
@@ -4153,10 +4147,7 @@ static int nf_tables_newobj(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
if (err != -ENOENT)
return err;
- obj = NULL;
- }
-
- if (obj != NULL) {
+ } else {
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL)
return -EEXIST;
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH nf-next v2 1/1] netfilter: nf_tables: Refine the codes to eliminate useless condition checks in nf_tables_api.c
2017-01-16 14:02 [PATCH nf-next v2 1/1] netfilter: nf_tables: Refine the codes to eliminate useless condition checks in nf_tables_api.c fgao
@ 2017-01-18 20:11 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2017-01-18 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fgao; +Cc: netfilter-devel, gfree.wind
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:02:57PM +0800, fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
> From: Gao Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
>
> The return value of nf_tables_table_lookup is valid pointer or one
> pointer error. There are two cases totally.
> case1: IS_ERR(table) is true, it would return the error or reset the
> table as NULL, it is unnecessary to perform the latter check
> "table != NULL".
> case2: IS_ERR(obj) is false, the table is one valid pointer. It is also
> unnecessary to perform that check.
> The nf_tables_newset and nf_tables_newobj have same logic codes.
>
> In summary, we could move the block of condition check "table != NULL"
> in the else block to eliminate the original condition checks.
Applied, thanks feng.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-18 20:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-16 14:02 [PATCH nf-next v2 1/1] netfilter: nf_tables: Refine the codes to eliminate useless condition checks in nf_tables_api.c fgao
2017-01-18 20:11 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).