From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [nft PATCH 0/3] Boolean comparison and exthdr existence match support
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:57:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170123125747.GA2017@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170117221007.14951-1-phil@nwl.cc>
Hi Phil,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:10:04PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> The following series adds two distinct features to nftables, though
> since the second one depends on presence of the first one this is
> submitted as a series.
>
> Patch 1 adds support for a boolean variant of relational expression.
> It's OP is strictly implicit and determined by RHS being a boolean
> expression. It depends on a related kernel patch adding support for
> NFT_CMP_BOOL to nft_cmp.c.
If the problem is that we lack of context from the delinearize path,
then I would prefer if you scratch one bit from the fib flags to
indicate that we want a true (1)/false (0) return value. Just like we
plan to do with exthdr. This should require a small kernel patch for
nft_fib I think.
Thus, we can skip this ad hoc update for nft_cmp which seems to me
that it's only there to help us get the context that we lack from the
delinearize step.
Then, from the delinearize path, if this fib/exthdr flag is set, we
attach the corresponding datatype to the expression based on this new
flag.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-23 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-17 22:10 [nft PATCH 0/3] Boolean comparison and exthdr existence match support Phil Sutter
2017-01-17 22:10 ` [nft PATCH 1/3] Implement boolean comparison in relational expression Phil Sutter
2017-01-17 22:10 ` [nft PATCH 2/3] exthdr: Add support for exthdr specific flags Phil Sutter
2017-01-17 22:10 ` [nft PATCH 3/3] exthdr: Implement exthdr existence check Phil Sutter
2017-01-23 12:57 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2017-02-06 14:26 ` [nft PATCH 0/3] Boolean comparison and exthdr existence match support Phil Sutter
2017-02-06 17:16 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-02-07 2:28 ` Phil Sutter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170123125747.GA2017@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).