* [PATCH nf-next v4 1/1] netfilter: nf_tables: Eliminate duplicated codes in nf_tables_table_enable
@ 2017-01-20 13:40 fgao
2017-02-02 13:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: fgao @ 2017-01-20 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pablo, netfilter-devel; +Cc: gfree.wind, Feng
From: Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
When something failed in nf_tables_table_enable, it would unregister
the chains. But the rollback codes are same as nf_tables_table_disable
almostly, except there is one counter check.
Now create one wrapper function to eliminate the duplicated codes.
Signed-off-by: Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
---
v4: Introduce one new counter "i" to resolve the "cnt" issue above;
v3: Use "cnt--" instead of "--cnt";
v2: Use cnt "0" as unlimited rules counter, per Pablo;
v1: Initial version;
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index a019a87..d84570a 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -576,6 +576,28 @@ static int nf_tables_gettable(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
return err;
}
+static void _nf_tables_table_disable(struct net *net,
+ const struct nft_af_info *afi,
+ struct nft_table *table,
+ u32 cnt)
+{
+ struct nft_chain *chain;
+ u32 i = 0;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) {
+ if (!nft_is_active_next(net, chain))
+ continue;
+ if (!(chain->flags & NFT_BASE_CHAIN))
+ continue;
+
+ if (cnt && i++ == cnt)
+ break;
+
+ nf_unregister_net_hooks(net, nft_base_chain(chain)->ops,
+ afi->nops);
+ }
+}
+
static int nf_tables_table_enable(struct net *net,
const struct nft_af_info *afi,
struct nft_table *table)
@@ -598,18 +620,8 @@ static int nf_tables_table_enable(struct net *net,
}
return 0;
err:
- list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) {
- if (!nft_is_active_next(net, chain))
- continue;
- if (!(chain->flags & NFT_BASE_CHAIN))
- continue;
-
- if (i-- <= 0)
- break;
-
- nf_unregister_net_hooks(net, nft_base_chain(chain)->ops,
- afi->nops);
- }
+ if (i)
+ _nf_tables_table_disable(net, afi, table, i);
return err;
}
@@ -617,17 +629,7 @@ static void nf_tables_table_disable(struct net *net,
const struct nft_af_info *afi,
struct nft_table *table)
{
- struct nft_chain *chain;
-
- list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) {
- if (!nft_is_active_next(net, chain))
- continue;
- if (!(chain->flags & NFT_BASE_CHAIN))
- continue;
-
- nf_unregister_net_hooks(net, nft_base_chain(chain)->ops,
- afi->nops);
- }
+ _nf_tables_table_disable(net, afi, table, 0);
}
static int nf_tables_updtable(struct nft_ctx *ctx)
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH nf-next v4 1/1] netfilter: nf_tables: Eliminate duplicated codes in nf_tables_table_enable
2017-01-20 13:40 [PATCH nf-next v4 1/1] netfilter: nf_tables: Eliminate duplicated codes in nf_tables_table_enable fgao
@ 2017-02-02 13:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2017-02-02 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fgao; +Cc: netfilter-devel, gfree.wind
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 09:40:43PM +0800, fgao@ikuai8.com wrote:
> From: Feng <fgao@ikuai8.com>
>
> When something failed in nf_tables_table_enable, it would unregister
> the chains. But the rollback codes are same as nf_tables_table_disable
> almostly, except there is one counter check.
> Now create one wrapper function to eliminate the duplicated codes.
Applied, thanks feng.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-02 13:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-20 13:40 [PATCH nf-next v4 1/1] netfilter: nf_tables: Eliminate duplicated codes in nf_tables_table_enable fgao
2017-02-02 13:29 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).