netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 nf] netfilter: don't track fragmented packets
Date: Fri,  3 Mar 2017 21:44:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170303204400.21565-1-fw@strlen.de> (raw)

Andrey reports syzkaller splat caused by

NF_CT_ASSERT(!ip_is_fragment(ip_hdr(skb)));

in ipv4 nat.  But this assertion (and the comment) are wrong, this function
does see fragments when IP_NODEFRAG setsockopt is used.

As conntrack doesn't track packets without complete l4 header, only the
first fragment is tracked.

Because applying nat to first packet but not the rest makes no sense this
also turns off tracking of all fragments.

Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
 Change since v1:
  - turn off tracking completely

 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c | 4 ++++
 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c       | 5 -----
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c            | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c
index fcfd071f4705..ec3e2934dd44 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c
@@ -165,6 +165,10 @@ static unsigned int ipv4_conntrack_local(void *priv,
 	if (skb->len < sizeof(struct iphdr) ||
 	    ip_hdrlen(skb) < sizeof(struct iphdr))
 		return NF_ACCEPT;
+
+	if (ip_is_fragment(ip_hdr(skb))) /* IP_NODEFRAG setsockopt set */
+		return NF_ACCEPT;
+
 	return nf_conntrack_in(state->net, PF_INET, state->hook, skb);
 }
 
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
index f8aad03d674b..6f5e8d01b876 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv4.c
@@ -255,11 +255,6 @@ nf_nat_ipv4_fn(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	/* maniptype == SRC for postrouting. */
 	enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype = HOOK2MANIP(state->hook);
 
-	/* We never see fragments: conntrack defrags on pre-routing
-	 * and local-out, and nf_nat_out protects post-routing.
-	 */
-	NF_CT_ASSERT(!ip_is_fragment(ip_hdr(skb)));
-
 	ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
 	/* Can't track?  It's not due to stress, or conntrack would
 	 * have dropped it.  Hence it's the user's responsibilty to
-- 
2.10.2


             reply	other threads:[~2017-03-03 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-03 20:44 Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-03-08 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 nf] netfilter: don't track fragmented packets Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170303204400.21565-1-fw@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).