netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH nf] netfilter: bridge: honor frag_max_size when refragmenting
Date: Thu,  9 Mar 2017 23:03:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170309220340.12713-1-fw@strlen.de> (raw)

consider a bridge with mtu 9000, but end host sending smaller
packets to another host with mtu < 9000.

In this case, after reassembly, bridge+defrag would refragment,
and then attempt to send the reassembled packet as long as it
was below 9k.

Instead we have to cap by the largest fragment size seen.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
 No Fixes tag, seems this problem has always existed.
 tested in kvm with both ipv4 and ipv6 and following setup:

 client (mtu 1500)  --- bridge(mtu 9k) --- client (mtu 1500)

 bridge (incl. all ports) have 9k mtu.

 without this patch, ping/ping6 only works for sizes <= 1500
 and > 9000.

 net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
index 95087e6e8258..81889afee212 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
@@ -721,18 +721,19 @@ static unsigned int nf_bridge_mtu_reduction(const struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge;
-	unsigned int mtu_reserved;
+	struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
+	unsigned int mtu, mtu_reserved;
 
 	mtu_reserved = nf_bridge_mtu_reduction(skb);
+	mtu = nf_bridge->frag_max_size;
+	if (mtu > skb->dev->mtu)
+		mtu = skb->dev->mtu;
 
-	if (skb_is_gso(skb) || skb->len + mtu_reserved <= skb->dev->mtu) {
+	if (skb_is_gso(skb) || skb->len + mtu_reserved <= mtu) {
 		nf_bridge_info_free(skb);
 		return br_dev_queue_push_xmit(net, sk, skb);
 	}
 
-	nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
-
 	/* This is wrong! We should preserve the original fragment
 	 * boundaries by preserving frag_list rather than refragmenting.
 	 */
-- 
2.10.2


             reply	other threads:[~2017-03-09 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-09 22:03 Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-03-09 22:15 ` [PATCH nf] netfilter: bridge: honor frag_max_size when refragmenting Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170309220340.12713-1-fw@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).