From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: "Alin Năstac" <alin.nastac@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: Parse ICMPv6 redirects
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:44:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170313134415.GA30191@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF1oqRDdVPxnpKv4ArDHh0ZJ=4sXuTrMHM=Rzj=WnBe02-xn-Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 02:17:39PM +0100, Alin Năstac wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:00:43AM +0100, Alin Nastac wrote:
> >> Extract IPv6 packet that triggered the sending of redirect message from
> >> ICMPv6 Redirected Header option and check if conntrack table contain such
> >> connection. Mark redirect packet as RELATED if a matching connection is found.
> >
> > I think we need a sysctl to enable this on demand, eg.
> > 'nf_conntrack_icmpv6_accept_redirects'
> >
> > This is changing the default behaviour, my main concern here is that
> > filtering policies not accepting redirects will now make it via
> > RELATED.
>
> net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_icmp.c give RELATED status to
> all ICMP redirect messages that refer to valid conntracks. Why would
> ICMPv6 redirect case be any different?
That's very valid argument, but we have this asymmetry for long time
ago, basically since the beginning. As I said, I have concerns on
changing this default behaviour without an explicit knob. This
behaviour change will go through inadvertently for many people.
> Would you implement a similar sysctl switch for ICMP redirect
> RELATED state? And if you do, would you accept to enable these
> switches by default?
I don't think we shouldn't enable this by default. We have tried to be
conservative on that side so far. Is it a problem there to enable this
via sysctl.conf?
Am I missing any requirement there that is not described in your patch
description?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-13 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-07 10:00 [PATCH v2] netfilter: Parse ICMPv6 redirects Alin Nastac
2017-03-13 12:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-03-13 13:17 ` Alin Năstac
2017-03-13 13:44 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2017-03-13 14:17 ` Alin Năstac
2017-03-13 17:00 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-03-13 17:49 ` Alin Năstac
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170313134415.GA30191@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=alin.nastac@gmail.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).