netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [nft PATCH] proto: Add some exotic ICMPv6 types
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 20:50:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170315195051.GE17939@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170315161514.GB28159@salvia>

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:15:14PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:55:01PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > This adds support for matching on inverse ND messages as defined by
> > RFC3122 (not implemented in Linux) and MLDv2 as defined by RFC3810.
> > 
> > Note that ICMPV6_MLD2_REPORT macro is defined in linux/icmpv6.h but
> > including that header leads to conflicts with symbols defined in
> > netinet/icmp6.h.
> > 
> > In addition to the above, "mld-listener-done" is introduced as an alias
> > for "mld-listener-reduction".
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
> > ---
> > This should resolve netfilter BZ#926.
> > ---
> >  src/proto.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/proto.c b/src/proto.c
> > index fb965304e59d9..6a8eed936d858 100644
> > --- a/src/proto.c
> > +++ b/src/proto.c
> > @@ -632,6 +632,10 @@ const struct proto_desc proto_ip = {
> >  
> >  #include <netinet/icmp6.h>
> >  
> > +#define IND_NEIGHBOR_SOLICIT	141
> > +#define IND_NEIGHBOR_ADVERT	142
> > +#define ICMPV6_MLD2_REPORT	143
> > +
> >  static const struct symbol_table icmp6_type_tbl = {
> >  	.base		= BASE_DECIMAL,
> >  	.symbols	= {
> > @@ -644,12 +648,16 @@ static const struct symbol_table icmp6_type_tbl = {
> >  		SYMBOL("mld-listener-query",		MLD_LISTENER_QUERY),
> >  		SYMBOL("mld-listener-report",		MLD_LISTENER_REPORT),
> >  		SYMBOL("mld-listener-reduction",	MLD_LISTENER_REDUCTION),
> > +		SYMBOL("mld-listener-done",		MLD_LISTENER_REDUCTION),
> 
> This one is duplicated, right?

Yes, it is the alias which was suggested in the ticket. Is this OK, or
should we rather respond with WONTFIX?

I realize this patch lacks an update to man page and a few test cases.
Should I reroll or send a follow-up?

Thanks, Phil

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-15 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-15 15:55 [nft PATCH] proto: Add some exotic ICMPv6 types Phil Sutter
2017-03-15 16:15 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-03-15 19:50   ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2017-03-15 21:47     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-03-16 12:43       ` [nft PATCH v2 1/2] " Phil Sutter
2017-03-16 12:43         ` [nft PATCH v2 2/2] doc: Describe ICMP(v6) expression and types Phil Sutter
2017-03-17 11:45           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-03-17 11:45         ` [nft PATCH v2 1/2] proto: Add some exotic ICMPv6 types Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170315195051.GE17939@orbyte.nwl.cc \
    --to=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).