From: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
To: pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
davem@davemloft.net, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH] net: netfilter: Remove complexity
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:30:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170328130032.GA5009@arushi-HP-Pavilion-Notebook> (raw)
To remove complexity of code the function is added in nfnetlink.h
to make code more clear and readable.
Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink.h | 6 ++++++
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 12 +++++++-----
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink.h b/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink.h
index 1b49209dd5c7..9a36a7c3145d 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink.h
@@ -50,6 +50,12 @@ static inline bool lockdep_nfnl_is_held(__u8 subsys_id)
{
return true;
}
+
+static inline u16 nfnl_msg_type(u8 subsys, u8 msg_type)
+{
+ return subsys << 8 | msg_type;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */
/*
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index aa344c5868c5..67f6f88a3e92 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ ctnetlink_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid, u32 seq, u32 type,
struct nlattr *nest_parms;
unsigned int flags = portid ? NLM_F_MULTI : 0, event;
- event = NFNL_SUBSYS_CTNETLINK << 8 | IPCTNL_MSG_CT_NEW;
+ event = nfnl_msg_type(NFNL_SUBSYS_CTNETLINK, IPCTNL_MSG_CT_NEW);
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, event, sizeof(*nfmsg), flags);
if (nlh == NULL)
goto nlmsg_failure;
@@ -1983,7 +1983,8 @@ ctnetlink_ct_stat_cpu_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid, u32 seq,
struct nfgenmsg *nfmsg;
unsigned int flags = portid ? NLM_F_MULTI : 0, event;
- event = NFNL_SUBSYS_CTNETLINK << 8 | IPCTNL_MSG_CT_GET_STATS_CPU;
+ event = nfnl_msg_type(NFNL_SUBSYS_CTNETLINK,
+ IPCTNL_MSG_CT_GET_STATS_CPU);
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, event, sizeof(*nfmsg), flags);
if (nlh == NULL)
goto nlmsg_failure;
@@ -2066,7 +2067,7 @@ ctnetlink_stat_ct_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid, u32 seq, u32 type,
unsigned int flags = portid ? NLM_F_MULTI : 0, event;
unsigned int nr_conntracks = atomic_read(&net->ct.count);
- event = NFNL_SUBSYS_CTNETLINK << 8 | IPCTNL_MSG_CT_GET_STATS;
+ event = nfnl_msg_type(NFNL_SUBSYS_CTNETLINK, IPCTNL_MSG_CT_GET_STATS);
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, event, sizeof(*nfmsg), flags);
if (nlh == NULL)
goto nlmsg_failure;
@@ -2576,7 +2577,7 @@ ctnetlink_exp_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid, u32 seq,
struct nfgenmsg *nfmsg;
unsigned int flags = portid ? NLM_F_MULTI : 0;
- event |= NFNL_SUBSYS_CTNETLINK_EXP << 8;
+ event = nfnl_msg_type(NFNL_SUBSYS_CTNETLINK_EXP, event);
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, event, sizeof(*nfmsg), flags);
if (nlh == NULL)
goto nlmsg_failure;
@@ -3223,7 +3224,8 @@ ctnetlink_exp_stat_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid, u32 seq, int cpu,
struct nfgenmsg *nfmsg;
unsigned int flags = portid ? NLM_F_MULTI : 0, event;
- event = NFNL_SUBSYS_CTNETLINK << 8 | IPCTNL_MSG_EXP_GET_STATS_CPU;
+ event = nfnl_msg_type(NFNL_SUBSYS_CTNETLINK,
+ IPCTNL_MSG_EXP_GET_STATS_CPU);
nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, event, sizeof(*nfmsg), flags);
if (nlh == NULL)
goto nlmsg_failure;
--
2.11.0
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-28 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-28 13:00 Arushi Singhal [this message]
2017-03-28 15:26 ` [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] net: netfilter: Remove complexity Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170328130032.GA5009@arushi-HP-Pavilion-Notebook \
--to=arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).