From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [nft PATCH 2/2] masquerade: Complain if no prerouting chain exists Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:58:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20170428145801.GA10616@salvia> References: <20170427132439.9443-1-phil@nwl.cc> <20170427132439.9443-2-phil@nwl.cc> <20170428080523.GI20805@orbyte.nwl.cc> <20170428082824.GJ20805@orbyte.nwl.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Phil Sutter , Netfilter Development Mailing list To: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:52496 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751249AbdD1O6G (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:58:06 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16545210564 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:58:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081B11850C for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:58:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70F6FF2F1 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:57:57 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:02:53AM +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > On 28 April 2017 at 10:28, Phil Sutter wrote: [...] > > Ah, thanks for the pointer! I tend to ignore anything that's not in the > > man page. :) > > Well, I guess adding more info to the man page won't hurt. > > Things I would add: > * some bits about NAT chains configuration (this issue) > * info about base chains priorities > * some bits about atomic operations Either we update the existing documentation (manpage and wiki) as Arturo suggest or we add some sort of transparent automatic NAT chain registration in the kernel.