From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: conntrack: fix false CRC32c mismatch using paged skb Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 23:29:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20170523212909.GA9041@salvia> References: <20170519084103.GA2512@salvia> <1495193970.2897.48.camel@redhat.com> <1495547465.3148.10.camel@redhat.com> <20170523193533.GA5009@salvia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner To: Davide Caratti Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:42092 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1034109AbdEWV3X (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2017 17:29:23 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id E678EE1231 for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 23:29:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E3BFF2F1 for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 23:29:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD700FF2F6 for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 23:29:07 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170523193533.GA5009@salvia> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:35:33PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 03:51:05PM +0200, Davide Caratti wrote: > > hello Pablo, > > On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 13:39 +0200, Davide Caratti wrote: > > > On Fri, 2017-05-19 at 10:41 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > > I mean, I can see other spots in the kernel tree that may be affected by this? > > > > Or is it that you're only observing this from a path that is specific > > > > of conntrack? > > > > > > I did the check before posting, and the kernel code seemed to already > > > ensure skb is writable until SCTP header + sizeof(SCTP header) offset, > > > before calling sctp_compute_cksum(). Just to be sure, I re-did that check > > > today: besides nf_conntrack sctp_error(), I'm only doubtful about IPVS > > > sctp_csum_check() (but I don't have a test scenario yet). > > > > looking at IPVS code: it seems to me that the only call to sctp_csum_check() > > is inside sctp_snat_handler(), after skb_make_writable() has returned > > successfully.  So, apparently misuse of sctp_compute_cksum() affects only > > nf_conntrack module in sctp_error() callback. > > > > Maybe this patch needs 'Fixes: cf6e007eef83 ("netfilter: conntrack: validate > > SCTP crc32c in PREROUTING")' tag ? > > Thanks for explaining. > > I will append this "Fixes:" tag to this patch once I apply this. Applied, thanks.