From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next RFC 0/5] netfilter: add net namespace support for cthelper Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 21:45:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20170604194535.GA2195@salvia> References: <1496589909-56730-1-git-send-email-zlpnobody@163.com> <20170604160753.GA843@breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Liping Zhang , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Westphal Return-path: Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:57838 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751176AbdFDTpp (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jun 2017 15:45:45 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id B155ADFE2A for ; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 21:45:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FA9100790 for ; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 21:45:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACF8100790 for ; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 21:45:32 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170604160753.GA843@breakpoint.cc> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 06:07:53PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Liping Zhang wrote: > > This patch set aims to add net namespace support for the ct helper, > > it is a little large, but I try my best to split them to a relative > > smaller patches, which will help to review. Comments are welcome. > > Why? Could you explain what kind of functionality is added here, or > what problem is fixed? > > Why do we need per netns complexity for helpers? I agree. We don't need this now that we have the new nft helper frontend in place that Florian implemented.