From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mjurczyk@google.com
Cc: fw@strlen.de, pablo@netfilter.org, kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
linux-decnet-user@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] decnet: dn_rtmsg: Improve input length sanitization in dnrmg_receive_user_skb
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 10:39:46 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170608.103946.1162801326439212865.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPr8fOQNP+y78xJqx5BNUfY6Rmjj2R8+jrz3Ett1SgdY+a5WLw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mateusz Jurczyk <mjurczyk@google.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 16:41:57 +0200
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
>> Mateusz Jurczyk <mjurczyk@google.com> wrote:
>>> Verify that the length of the socket buffer is sufficient to cover the
>>> nlmsghdr structure before accessing the nlh->nlmsg_len field for further
>>> input sanitization. If the client only supplies 1-3 bytes of data in
>>> sk_buff, then nlh->nlmsg_len remains partially uninitialized and
>>> contains leftover memory from the corresponding kernel allocation.
>>> Operating on such data may result in indeterminate evaluation of the
>>> nlmsg_len < sizeof(*nlh) expression.
>>>
>>> The bug was discovered by a runtime instrumentation designed to detect
>>> use of uninitialized memory in the kernel. The patch prevents this and
>>> other similar tools (e.g. KMSAN) from flagging this behavior in the future.
>>
>> Instead of changing all the internal users wouldn't it be better
>> to add this check once in netlink_unicast_kernel?
>>
>
> Perhaps. I must admit I'm not very familiar with this code
> area/interface, so I preferred to fix the few specific cases instead
> of submitting a general patch, which might have some unexpected side
> effects, e.g. behavior different from one of the internal clients etc.
>
> If you think one check in netlink_unicast_kernel is a better way to do
> it, I'm happy to implement it like that.
Until we decide to add the check to netlink_unicast_kernel(), I'm applying
this and queueing it up for -stable.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-08 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-07 13:14 [PATCH] decnet: dn_rtmsg: Improve input length sanitization in dnrmg_receive_user_skb Mateusz Jurczyk
2017-06-07 14:14 ` [PATCH v2] " Mateusz Jurczyk
2017-06-07 14:18 ` Florian Westphal
2017-06-07 14:41 ` Mateusz Jurczyk
2017-06-08 14:39 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170608.103946.1162801326439212865.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=linux-decnet-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjurczyk@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).