From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Westphal Subject: Re: using nft & iptables nat in parallel Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:58:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20170614095803.GC10130@breakpoint.cc> References: <20170614092448.GB10130@breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Florian Westphal , Netfilter Development Mailing list To: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([146.0.238.67]:52846 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751608AbdFNJ6m (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 05:58:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > I'm curious, What is the use case of using both nftables and iptables > at the same time? > Some missing functionality in nft? > Perhaps some ipt->nft partial migration procedure? Yes, partial migration. Right now there are an awful lot of tools out there (docker, libvirt, kubernetes, ..) that call iptables(-restore) directly (or inject them via firewalld). And unfortunately I don't see how we can magically move all of this to nftables. So allowing to do a step-by-step migration seems the only viable option.