From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nft 0/4] restrict meta nfproto to inet family
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 11:35:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170618093553.GA19741@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170616203411.16408-1-fw@strlen.de>
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:34:07PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Pablo reports following test case failure:
>
> any/ct.t: ERROR: line 94: src/nft add rule --debug=netlink ip6
> test-ip6 output meta nfproto ipv4 ct original saddr 1.2.3.4: This rule should not have failed.
>
> We can't find upper layer protocol in this case, but even if we'd
> "fix" this it is still non-sensical, as
>
> meta nfproto ipv4
>
> will never match except in the inet family and the
> ip family, but in the latter case it will always match so it
> has no effect).
>
> So, first step is to move this to an inet specific test to
> get rid of the test case failure.
>
> The followup changes then get rid of meta nfproto tests or
> move them to inet-family-only tests.
>
> The last patch makes nft reject 'meta nfproto' in all families
> except inet, where this expression is needed in case one wants to
> explicitly restrict a rule to only ipv4 or ipv6.
Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Thanks Florian.
Can we probably get rid of meta nfproto at some point? IIRC it's only
needed because skb->protocol is not set in the output hook, but it is
indeed available in postrouting. Can you find any reason for this
behaviour?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-18 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-16 20:34 [PATCH nft 0/4] restrict meta nfproto to inet family Florian Westphal
2017-06-16 20:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] tests: restrict ct saddr test " Florian Westphal
2017-06-16 20:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] tests: remove two non-sensical rules Florian Westphal
2017-06-16 20:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] tests: restrict meta nfproto test cases to inet family Florian Westphal
2017-06-16 20:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] evaluate: reject meta nfproto outside of " Florian Westphal
2017-06-18 9:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-06-18 9:35 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170618093553.GA19741@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).