From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Cc: ja@ssi.bg, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] netfilter: Remove duplicated rcu_read_lock.
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 20:20:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170619182052.GA19682@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170605152125.24978-1-ap420073@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 12:21:25AM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> Some functions are called by nf_hook() and these
> functions hold rcu_read_lock() But nf_hook() already holds
> rcu_read_lock() therefore callee's rcu_read_lock() are useless.
> Below messages are calltrace.
Another comestic change, regarding commit log.
Instead of this large commit log, with all these call traces, I would
like to see a more comprehensive explanation per file, eg.
[...]
> 16. destroy_conntrack
> -nf_ct_destroy
> --nf_conntrack_destroy
destroy_destroy() is called from rcu protected callback function, so
rcu read side lock is already guaranteed.
[...]
> 17. __ctnetlink_glue_build
Another example: Called from packet path, netfilter hooks run under
rcu read lock side, so all packet path code is under rcu read side
lock.
If possible... No problem if you're non-native English speaker, most
of us are not, so some hints to understand why rcu_read_lock() is not
required in natural languages seems like a good fit for the git
repository IMO.
Don't get me wrong, the calltraces are fine for review, but I would
like we don't land such a loooong commit message in the netfilter
tree.
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-19 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-05 15:21 [PATCH V2] netfilter: Remove duplicated rcu_read_lock Taehee Yoo
2017-06-05 18:59 ` Julian Anastasov
2017-06-19 18:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-06-20 15:32 ` Taehee Yoo
2017-06-19 18:20 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170619182052.GA19682@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).