From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: "Bjørnar Ness" <bjornar.ness@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: crash on >= 4.9.0 kernel seems nf related
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:16:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170626131632.GI29636@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJO99T=5RPz691h9kAnSsC4fy_54o3qWU_2o-4FhHrxp5af7MQ@mail.gmail.com>
Bjørnar Ness <bjornar.ness@gmail.com> wrote:
> When trying to narrow down the problem, I removed the NAT rules, and
> in particular
> the
>
> chain postrouting {
> type nat hook postrouting priority 100
> }
>
> And the problem disappears. Commenting in the above block again,
> causes the following to happen:
>
> kworker/0:0 starts to use more and more cpu, and in less than a minute
> renders the
> machine useless. If network cable is unplugged, it takes aroung 30
> seconds for the machine to get into a useful state again.
The kworker is most likely the conntrack gc worker, but the gc worker is nat
agnostic, so I don't see how this makes a difference wrt. nat
postrouting hook presence.
perf top might help pinpoint the source.
What kernel is this, exactly?
4.10 (and 4.9.14 and later) has a change to make gc worker use less
cycles.
But I don't see the NAT connection.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-26 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-03 11:31 crash on >= 4.9.0 kernel seems nf related Bjørnar Ness
2017-05-16 8:18 ` Bjørnar Ness
2017-05-16 8:21 ` Florian Westphal
2017-05-18 7:41 ` Bjørnar Ness
2017-06-20 10:28 ` Bjørnar Ness
2017-06-26 13:16 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-06-27 11:23 ` Bjørnar Ness
2017-06-28 10:23 ` Florian Westphal
2017-06-29 8:44 ` Bjørnar Ness
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170626131632.GI29636@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=bjornar.ness@gmail.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).