netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [nft crap] ct original ip saddr ... handling
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:31:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170628223139.GB9307@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170628163545.GA3874@salvia>

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > There are no shift/reduce errors, things compile fine, and all
> > test cases work.  Its just that we break 'ct event set label':
> > 
> > Works:
> > ct event set new or reply
> > ct event set new,reply
> > ct event set new,label
> > fails:
> > ct event set label ('expects COMMA')
> 
> This can be fixed, it's just a matter we need more time, right?

Actually this makes it work for me:

diff --git a/src/parser_bison.y b/src/parser_bison.y
--- a/src/parser_bison.y
+++ b/src/parser_bison.y
@@ -2432,11 +2432,11 @@ fib_tuple		:  	fib_flag	DOT	fib_tuple
 			;
 
 shift_expr		:	primary_expr
-			|	shift_expr		LSHIFT		primary_expr
+			|	shift_expr		LSHIFT		primary_rhs_expr
 			{
 				$$ = binop_expr_alloc(&@$, OP_LSHIFT, $1, $3);
 			}
-			|	shift_expr		RSHIFT		primary_expr
+			|	shift_expr		RSHIFT		primary_rhs_expr
 			{
 				$$ = binop_expr_alloc(&@$, OP_RSHIFT, $1, $3);
 			}
@@ -3154,6 +3154,7 @@ list_stmt_expr		:	symbol_rhs_expr	COMMA	symbol_rhs_expr
 			;
 
 ct_stmt_expr		:	expr
+			|	keyword_expr
 			|	list_stmt_expr
 			;

(I added keyword_expr before and that causes reduce error, but did
 not have time to figure out where they come from).

Restricting shift_expr RHS to primary_rhs_expr makes this work for
me, all test cases that are expected to pass work.

Only effect AFAICS this has is that this:

nft add rule f i iif lshift mark eq 0
<cmdline>:1:25-28: Error: Right hand side of binary operation (<<) must be constant

turns into
<cmdline>:1:25-28: Error: syntax error, unexpected mark
add rule f i iif lshift mark eq 0

so I think restricting shift_expr rhs in grammar is fine.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-28 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-28 10:06 [nft crap] ct original ip saddr ... handling Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:06 ` [PATCH 01/17] rename struct ct to ct_helper Florian Westphal
2017-07-18 16:54   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-06-28 10:06 ` [PATCH 02/17] src: prepare for future ct timeout policy support Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:06 ` [PATCH 03/17] parser: use scanner tokens again for ct key handling Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:06 ` [PATCH 04/17] parser: compact list of rhs keyword expressions Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:06 ` [PATCH 05/17] bison: permit 'label' on rhs side of expression Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:06 ` [PATCH 06/17] bison: permit keywords in list_stmt_expressions Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:06 ` [PATCH 07/17] tests: ct: remove unsupported syntax Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:06 ` [PATCH 08/17] src: add alternate syntax for ct saddr Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:06 ` [PATCH 09/17] src: ct: store proto base of ct key, if any Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:06 ` [PATCH 10/17] src: ct: add eval part to inject dependencies for ct saddr/daddr Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:14 ` [PATCH 11/17] src: unifiy meta and ct postprocessing Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:14   ` [PATCH 12/17] tests: update inet/bridge icmp test case Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:14   ` [PATCH 13/17] src: ct: print nfproto name for some header fields Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:14   ` [PATCH 14/17] tests: ct: adjust test case commands Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:14   ` [PATCH 15/17] src: rt: add keyword distinction for nexthop vs nexthop6 Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:14   ` [PATCH 16/17] tests: rt: fix test cases Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 10:14   ` [PATCH 17/17] doc: update man page Florian Westphal
2017-06-28 16:35 ` [nft crap] ct original ip saddr ... handling Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-06-28 22:31   ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-06-29  0:39     ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170628223139.GB9307@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).