From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Laurent Fasnacht <l@libres.ch>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nft: make raw payloads work
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:18:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170629161840.GA6789@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1498036020-22214-1-git-send-email-l@libres.ch>
Hi Laurent,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:07:00AM +0200, Laurent Fasnacht wrote:
> In nftables, there is a rather (IMO) undocumented feature, raw payloads.
>
> It would be useful both for development and to quickly extend nftables for corner cases.
>
> Unfortunately, it is broken in current master (syntax is not consistent between print and parse,
> and any practical usage doesn't work).
>
> This patch defines a new syntax, and makes it usable in practice:
>
> @<protocol>,<base>,<data type>,<offset>,<length>
>
> Example (rewrite arp packet target hardware address if target protocol address matches a given address):
>
> meta iif enp2s0 arp ptype 0x0800 arp htype 1 arp hlen 6 arp plen 4 @arp,nh,ipv4_addr,192,32 192.168.143.16 @arp,nh,ether_addr,144,48 set 11:22:33:44:55:66 accept;
One thing related to this example: Would you send a patch to extend
the arp family to match sender/target fields in the header? We only
support ARP IPv4, so we can assume the header is "fixed size" for the
offset layout definitions. See src/proto.c, have a look at the arp
protocol definition.
Regarding raw protocol matching. Depending on the datatype, we may not
need the size. I mean, in case of the ipv4_addr datatype, this is
already 4 bytes. For (the generic) integer type fields, we need this
size indeed.
So I think we should allow two different syntax, one with size, and
another with no size. If you select a datatype with a fixed size, then
bail out during the parser/evaluation phase.
Something else: If the user specifies a raw expression that matches a
protocol field that is already defined by nft, this should
automatically translate this to the native nft representation.
It would be also great if you could add a bit of tests for the
tests/py infrastructure, or at least, document the bunch of examples
you have used to test this.
Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-29 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-21 9:07 [PATCH] nft: make raw payloads work Laurent Fasnacht
2017-06-29 16:18 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170629161840.GA6789@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=l@libres.ch \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).