From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] inetpeer: remove AVL implementation in favor of RB tree
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:59:15 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170717.085915.556973296335189682.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500285370.5566.20.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:56:10 -0700
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>
> As discussed in Faro during Netfilter Workshop 2017, RB trees can be
> used with RCU, using a seqlock.
>
> Note that net/rxrpc/conn_service.c is already using this.
>
> This patch converts inetpeer from AVL tree to RB tree, since it allows
> to remove private AVL implementation in favor of shared RB code.
>
> $ size net/ipv4/inetpeer.before net/ipv4/inetpeer.after
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 3195 40 128 3363 d23 net/ipv4/inetpeer.before
> 1562 24 0 1586 632 net/ipv4/inetpeer.after
>
> The same technique can be used to speed up
> net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c (removing rwlock contention in fast path)
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Applied, thanks for doing this Eric.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-17 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-05 16:00 [PATCH RFC] inetpeer: remove AVL implementation in favor of RB tree Eric Dumazet
2017-07-05 16:38 ` Mika Penttilä
[not found] ` <CAHTyZGz+vL0A9vJAuqFv88t1mZhgjSdZrX=n8_wCtOZfJBSA5A@mail.gmail.com>
2017-07-05 17:54 ` Mika Penttilä
2017-07-17 9:56 ` [PATCH net-next] " Eric Dumazet
2017-07-17 15:59 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170717.085915.556973296335189682.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).